Skip to main content
565-H-HC-BF-DG vs 575-H-HC-BF-DG 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG

Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG
Boviet Solar
BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG
565 Wp 21.78 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG
Boviet Solar
BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG
575 Wp 22.26 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

575-H-HC-BF-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 565-H-HC-BF-DG 575-H-HC-BF-DG Difference
Module efficiency 21.78 % 22.26 % 0.48 pp more efficient
Power density 218.7 Wp/m² 222.6 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 565 Wp 575 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
565-H-HC-BF-DG
18,606 kWh
575-H-HC-BF-DG
18,935 kWh
Lifetime gap
329 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 565-H-HC-BF-DG 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 565 W 575 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 534 W 543 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 502 W 511 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 471 W 479 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 565-H-HC-BF-DG 575-H-HC-BF-DG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 565 Wp 575 Wp +10 W for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Module efficiency 21.78 % 22.26 % +0.48 pp for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Power density 218.7 Wp/m² 222.6 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage 49.86 V 50.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.12 V 42.46 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.32 A 14.44 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.42 A 13.55 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.370 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.0 kg 32.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.6 kg/kWp 55.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,206 vs #5,593
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 1,613 places
Power density
#6,841 vs #5,549
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 1,292 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #13,081
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,768 vs #10,019
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 749 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,810 vs #4,950
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 860 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG or Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG?
According to our database: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 21.78%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG has a module efficiency of 21.78%, while Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG is 22.26%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG use vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG bifacial panels?
Both Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.