Skip to main content
A460-MCE54Db vs A485-MCE54Db 14 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db

AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db
AIKO-A460-MCE54Db
460 Wp 23.00 % Back Contact
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
485 Wp 24.30 % Back Contact
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

A485-MCE54Db leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
14 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

5 of 19 parameters
Parameter A460-MCE54Db A485-MCE54Db Difference
Module efficiency 23.00 % 24.30 % 1.30 pp more efficient
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 242.7 Wp/m² 12.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 460 Wp 485 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 50.5 kg/kWp 2.7 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power 13.62 A 14.15 A 0.53 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
A460-MCE54Db
15,554 kWh
A485-MCE54Db
16,399 kWh
Lifetime gap
845 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario A460-MCE54Db A485-MCE54Db
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 485 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 442 W 466 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 424 W 447 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 406 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter A460-MCE54Db A485-MCE54Db Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 485 Wp +25 W for A485-MCE54Db
Module efficiency 23.00 % 24.30 % +1.30 pp for A485-MCE54Db
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 242.7 Wp/m² +12.5 Wp/m² for A485-MCE54Db
Open-circuit voltage 40.40 V 40.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.80 V 34.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.58 A 14.88 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.62 A 14.15 A 0.53 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.5 kg 24.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 50.5 kg/kWp -2.7 kg/kWp for A485-MCE54Db
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact Back Contact Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #131
A485-MCE54Db leads by 1,788 places
Power density
#1,876 vs #140
A485-MCE54Db leads by 1,736 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,102 vs #3,884
A485-MCE54Db leads by 3,218 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,285 vs #2,953
A485-MCE54Db leads by 2,332 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Db
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MCE54Db
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db or AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has higher module efficiency (24.30% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db and AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db is 24.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db use vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db uses Back Contact cells; AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db and AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 180 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.