Skip to main content
MID 30K-HU vs GW30K-ET 13 of 25 identical Swap Change inverters

Growatt MID 30K-HU vs GoodWe GW30K-ET

Growatt MID 30K-HU
Growatt
MID 30K-HU
30 kW 97.2 % euro Hybrid
VS
GoodWe GW30K-ET
GoodWe
GW30K-ET
30 kW Hybrid
The verdict

MID 30K-HU leads on the differences that matter

The largest is max input current per tracker: 10.0 A more headroom. 13 of 25 comparable parameters are identical, with 7 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
13 of 25 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

12 of 25 parameters
Parameter MID 30K-HU GW30K-ET Difference
Max input current per tracker 40.0 A 30.0 A 10.0 A more headroom
Max efficiency 98.6 % 98.0 % 0.6 pp more efficient
Max AC power 30.00 kW 33.00 kW 3.00 kW apart
Max PV power 60.00 kW 45.00 kW 15.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio 2.00 1.50 0.50 more oversizing headroom
Max charge current 42 A 50 A 8 A faster charging
Weight 48.0 kg 54.0 kg 6.0 kg lighter
Start voltage 160 V 200 V 40 V earlier start
MPPT voltage range 200-1000 V 200-850 V 200-1000 V vs 200-850 V
Battery voltage 600-980 V 200-800 600-980 V vs 200-800
Weight per kW 1.6 kg/kW 1.8 kg/kW 0.2 kg/kW lighter
Dimensions 570x680x256 mm 660x520x220 mm 570x680x256 mm vs 660x520x220 mm
02

Full specification

Parameter MID 30K-HU GW30K-ET Difference
AC output
Rated AC power 30.00 kW 30.00 kW Same
Max AC power 30.00 kW 33.00 kW 3.00 kW apart
Grid connection 3-phase 3-phase Same
Nominal AC voltage 400 V 400 V Same
Max AC current 50.0 A 50.0 A Same
PV input
Max PV power 60.00 kW 45.00 kW 15.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio 2.00 1.50 +0.50 for MID 30K-HU
Max DC voltage 1000 V 1000 V Same
MPPT voltage range 200-1000 V 200-850 V 200-1000 V vs 200-850 V
Start voltage 160 V 200 V -40 V for MID 30K-HU
MPP trackers - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Strings per tracker 2 2 Same
Max input current per tracker 40.0 A 30.0 A +10.0 A for MID 30K-HU
Efficiency
European efficiency 97.2 % - Not published by GoodWe
Max efficiency 98.6 % 98.0 % +0.6 pp for MID 30K-HU
CEC efficiency - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input Yes Yes Same
Battery voltage 600-980 V 200-800 600-980 V vs 200-800
Max charge current 42 A 50 A +8 A for GW30K-ET
Backup power 30.0 kW - Not published by GoodWe
Physical
Weight 48.0 kg 54.0 kg -6.0 kg for MID 30K-HU
Weight per kW 1.6 kg/kW 1.8 kg/kW -0.2 kg/kW for MID 30K-HU
Dimensions 570x680x256 mm 660x520x220 mm 570x680x256 mm vs 660x520x220 mm
Ingress protection IP66 IP66 Same
Cooling forced-air forced-air Same
Noise 55 dB - Not published by GoodWe
Max operating temperature 60 °C 60 °C Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi Yes Yes Same
Ethernet - Yes Not published by Growatt
Arc fault protection Yes Yes Same
Integrated DC switch Yes Yes Same
Warranty
Warranty 5 yrs - Not published by GoodWe
03

More useful comparisons

Open all inverters
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
Growatt MID 30K-HU vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P30K-H
10 differences, the largest is max efficiency
Same type, similar size
Deye
Growatt MID 30K-HU vs Deye SUN-30K-SG01HP3-EU-BM3
15 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
Growatt MID 30K-HU vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P30K-H-LV
11 differences, the largest is european efficiency
04

Written summary

Checking cache...

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.