GoodWe GW30K-ET vs Growatt MID 30K-HU
VS
The verdict
MID 30K-HU leads on the differences that matter
The largest is max input current per tracker: 10.0 A more headroom. 13 of 25 comparable parameters are identical, with 7 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 25 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 25 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
GW30K-ET
MID 30K-HU
Difference
Max input current per tracker
30.0 A
40.0 A
10.0 A more headroom
Max efficiency
98.0 %
98.6 %
0.6 pp more efficient
Max AC power
33.00 kW
30.00 kW
3.00 kW apart
Max PV power
45.00 kW
60.00 kW
15.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
1.50
2.00
0.50 more oversizing headroom
Max charge current
50 A
42 A
8 A faster charging
Weight
54.0 kg
48.0 kg
6.0 kg lighter
Start voltage
200 V
160 V
40 V earlier start
MPPT voltage range
200-850 V
200-1000 V
200-850 V vs 200-1000 V
Battery voltage
200-800
600-980 V
200-800 vs 600-980 V
Weight per kW
1.8 kg/kW
1.6 kg/kW
0.2 kg/kW lighter
Dimensions
660x520x220 mm
570x680x256 mm
660x520x220 mm vs 570x680x256 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
GW30K-ET
MID 30K-HU
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
30.00 kW
30.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
33.00 kW
30.00 kW
3.00 kW apart
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
50.0 A
50.0 A
Same
PV input
Max PV power
45.00 kW
60.00 kW
15.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
1.50
2.00
+0.50 for MID 30K-HU
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1000 V
Same
MPPT voltage range
200-850 V
200-1000 V
200-850 V vs 200-1000 V
Start voltage
200 V
160 V
-40 V for MID 30K-HU
MPP trackers
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Strings per tracker
2
2
Same
Max input current per tracker
30.0 A
40.0 A
+10.0 A for MID 30K-HU
Efficiency
European efficiency
-
97.2 %
Not published by GoodWe
Max efficiency
98.0 %
98.6 %
+0.6 pp for MID 30K-HU
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
Yes
Yes
Same
Battery voltage
200-800
600-980 V
200-800 vs 600-980 V
Max charge current
50 A
42 A
+8 A for GW30K-ET
Backup power
-
30.0 kW
Not published by GoodWe
Physical
Weight
54.0 kg
48.0 kg
-6.0 kg for MID 30K-HU
Weight per kW
1.8 kg/kW
1.6 kg/kW
-0.2 kg/kW for MID 30K-HU
Dimensions
660x520x220 mm
570x680x256 mm
660x520x220 mm vs 570x680x256 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
-
55 dB
Not published by GoodWe
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Same
Ethernet
Yes
-
Not published by Growatt
Arc fault protection
Yes
Yes
Same
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
5 yrs
Not published by GoodWe
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
GoodWe GW30K-ET vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P30K-H
13 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Deye
GoodWe GW30K-ET vs Deye SUN-30K-SG01HP3-EU-BM3
12 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
GoodWe GW30K-ET vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P30K-H-LV
14 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Growatt MID 30K-HU vs Growatt MID 30KTL3-XH
10 differences, the largest is max dc voltage
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.