Clelo Tech vs Q-Cells - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
Clelo Tech
China · est. 2017Q-Cells
South Korea · est. 1999
Panel models
7
vs
91
Max power
720 W
vs
635 W
Max efficiency
23.20%
vs
23.20%
Bifacial share
100%
vs
42%
At a glance
Q-Cells has the broader catalog (91 vs 7 models). Clelo Tech leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Clelo Tech
Website
Jiangsu Clelo Material Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese solar manufacturer and system integrator based in Changshu, Suzhou, specializing in photovoltaic panels, BIPV technology, and complete PV power plant solutions. The company offers products and turnkey systems ranging from small residential installations to...
Headquarters
Changshu, China
Founded
2017
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
-
Stock
-
Q-Cells
Website
Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Founded
1999
Employees
2,000
Production Capacity
11.2 GW/year
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
Clelo Tech
|
Q-Cells
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 7 | 91 +84 |
| Max Power | 720 W +85 W | 635 W |
| Avg Power | 705 W +243 W | 462 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 23.20% |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.70% +1.44 pp | 21.26% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C +0.083 | -0.323%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 7 (100%) +58 pp | 38 (42%) |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs +2.9 yr | 27.1 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandClelo Tech
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JT720SLkB Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | JT715SLkB Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | JT710SLkB Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | JT705SLkB Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | JT700SLkB Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | JT695SLkB Bi | 695W | 22.4% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | JT690SLkB Bi | 690W | 22.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Q-Cells
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 Bi | 635W | 22.7% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 Bi | 630W | 22.6% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 Bi | 625W | 22.4% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 Bi | 620W | 22.2% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 615 Bi | 615W | 22.0% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 610 Bi | 610W | 21.8% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 Bi | 605W | 21.7% | -0.340%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3/BFG 605 Bi | 605W | 21.7% | -0.340%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3/BFG 600 Bi | 600W | 21.5% | -0.340%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3/BFG 600 Bi | 600W | 21.5% | -0.340%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 7 panels average
Efficiency
22.70%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.01%
Temp coeff
-0.316%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Clelo Tech skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Clelo Tech offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Clelo Tech Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
Q-Cells Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: PERC (38%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.