Skip to main content

Bisol vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Bisol
Slovenia Founded 2004
Read the Bisol review
VS
Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 12 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
12 637
Highest power
580 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
23.5% 24.8%
Average efficiency
21.8% 22.2%
Bifacial share
8% 36%
Average warranty
30 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Bisol

BISOL Group is a European manufacturer of high-quality photovoltaic modules headquartered in Prebold, Slovenia. Founded in 2004, it is considered Europe's leading authentic solar module producer with a production capacity of 750 MW and products distributed in over 120 countries. The company operates debt-free and has...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Prebold, Slovenia
Annual capacity
<1 GW/year
Employees
200-500
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Bisol Jinko Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 12 637+625
Max Power 580 W 735 W+155 W
Avg Power 475 W 523 W+48 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.50% 24.80%+1.30 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.75% 22.18%+0.43 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.291%/°C+0.013 -0.304%/°C
Bifacial Share 1 (8%) 231 (36%)+28 pp
Avg Warranty 29.6 yrs+0.9 yr 28.7 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Bisol skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Bisol cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (58%)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Bisol and Jinko Solar occupy fundamentally different positions in the global solar PV landscape. Bisol, founded in 2004 and headquartered in Slovenia, is a small-to-mid-sized European manufacturer with 200-500 employees and a production capacity below 1 GW. It does not hold Tier 1 bankable status, but it has built a strong reputation for quality and traceability within European markets. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China, is one of the largest solar manufacturers in the world, with over 33,800 employees, an annual production capacity of 130 GW, and consistent Tier 1 bankable status - the company is also publicly listed on the NYSE. The difference in scale is stark: Bisol offers 12 panel models while Jinko's portfolio spans 545 models, reflecting its position as a full-spectrum supplier serving every major market segment globally.

From a technology standpoint, Bisol's portfolio peaks at 580 Wp with a maximum efficiency of 23.5%, and the company introduced G12R TOPCon-based modules in 2025, signaling a step toward next-generation cell technology. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.291%/°C is slightly better than Jinko's -0.308%/°C, and its average warranty term of approximately 29.6 years edges out Jinko's 28.5 years - Bisol is notably the only manufacturer offering a 25-year 100% output power guarantee. Only 8.3% of Bisol's modules are bifacial, making it better suited to conventional residential rooftop installs where bifacial gain is limited. Jinko's Tiger Neo TOPCon series pushes efficiency to 24.8% and maximum power to 735 Wp, with 31.9% of its portfolio being bifacial - a strong fit for utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial C&I projects where bifacial yield matters. Jinko has also earned 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer, underpinning its reliability credentials.

For international buyers, the choice between the two depends heavily on project type and procurement priorities. Bisol is best suited for residential and light commercial installations in Europe where buyers prioritize ethical supply chains, European manufacturing, and long warranty terms - its low 0.01% claim rate and hail-resistance certifications reinforce its value in quality-sensitive markets. Jinko Solar is the stronger choice for utility-scale developers, large C&I projects, and any buyer for whom bankability and volume supply security are non-negotiable - its Tier 1 status, unmatched production scale, and broad high-power bifacial portfolio make it one of the most versatile and financeable options available anywhere in the world.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Bisol A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Bisol AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Bisol AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Jinko Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 12 Bisol offers · See 171 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.