Avaada vs Waaree - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Waaree has the broader catalog (222 vs 12 models). Avaada leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Avaada leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Avaada Group is a diversified Indian clean energy conglomerate active in renewable power generation, solar PV manufacturing, green hydrogen, battery storage, and pumped hydro. Its manufacturing arm, Avaada Electro, produces high-efficiency N-Type TOPCon solar cells and modules and is rapidly scaling capacity in Uttar...
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Mumbai, India
- Annual capacity
- 8-10 GW/year
- Employees
- 2000-3000
Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC...
- Founded
- 1990
- Headquarters
- Mumbai, India
- Annual capacity
- 13.3 GW/year
- Employees
- 8500+
- Listed
- NSE: WAAREEENER
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Avaada skews to higher efficiency: 67% of lineup is 23%+
Avaada offers more 600W+ panels (83% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (100%)
Dominant cell tech: PERC (48%)
The flagships
Written summary
Avaada is an Indian solar manufacturer operating under Avaada Electro, the module arm of the Brookfield-backed Avaada Group, and has grown rapidly from roughly 1.5 GW of module capacity in late 2024 to about 8.5 GW by late 2025, with facilities in Dadri (Uttar Pradesh) and Nagpur (Maharashtra) and plans to expand toward 13.6 GW of modules and 12 GW of cells. Wood Mackenzie awarded Avaada Electro a "Grade A" rating in its H1 2025 global module manufacturer rankings, a strong bankability signal, though no source confirms a formal BNEF Tier 1 listing. Waaree Energies is a longer-established Indian manufacturer with roughly 13.3 GW of installed module capacity across five facilities in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh, plus a US assembly plant, and is widely cited (including by its own disclosures) as a BNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer. On institutional footprint, Waaree currently has the edge, with greater manufacturing scale, a longer public track record, and more consistent third-party Tier 1 recognition, while Avaada is the faster-growing newer entrant now pursuing an IPO.
Both companies concentrate on N-type TOPCon bifacial glass-to-glass modules aimed primarily at utility-scale and commercial ground-mount or rooftop projects, reflecting India's push toward higher-efficiency domestic manufacturing. Avaada's Butibori plant produces ALMM-listed G12 modules up to 720 Wp and G12R modules up to 630 Wp, with company-cited efficiency around 23.32%, and its modules were named "Top Performer" in Kiwa PVEL's 2026 Reliability Scorecard across six test categories, one of the stronger independent reliability signals found for either brand. Waaree's current flagship is a 585/590 Wp TOPCon bifacial module, and it has also unveiled a newer 645 Wp TOPCon G12R back-contact module rated at 23.88% efficiency; its residential-oriented panels run in the 415-445 W range with efficiency up to about 22.79%. Both brands offer comparable 12-year product and 30-year linear power warranties, and both hold standard IEC, BIS, UL, and TUV-type certifications typical of bankable Indian manufacturers.
For a typical 2025 buyer, especially on utility-scale or large commercial projects, Waaree is the safer default given its larger manufacturing base, longer operating history, and more firmly established Tier 1 standing, while Avaada is a credible and fast-rising alternative whose Kiwa PVEL reliability recognition and Wood Mackenzie Grade A rating suggest it is closing the gap quickly. The two are not yet fully interchangeable, but the practical difference for most buyers will come down to project-specific factors like lead times, local ALMM listing, and financing terms rather than a clear quality gap.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-10-27
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 26 Waaree offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.