AUSTA ENERGY vs AKCOME - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AUSTA ENERGY has the broader catalog (58 vs 3 models). AUSTA ENERGY leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
AUSTA Energy is an Indian solar panel manufacturer based in Surat, Gujarat. The company produces monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar modules for residential and commercial applications, focusing on the domestic Indian market and select export markets.
- Founded
- 2015
- Headquarters
- Surat, India
- Annual capacity
- 1 GW/year
- Employees
- 200
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AUSTA ENERGY skews to higher efficiency: 7% of lineup is 23%+
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (55%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
Austa Energy, trading as Austa Solar, is a Chinese manufacturer based in Ningbo and operating under the broader Osda Group umbrella, with additional production facilities in Jiaxing and other domestic sites. The brand traces its module manufacturing roots to around 2009 and has positioned itself around N-type TOPCon cell technology, with reported production capacity at the Osda Group level reaching several gigawatts annually as of 2025. No confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability listing for Austa Energy specifically was found in available sources. Akcome (Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd.) was founded in 2006 in Jiangsu province, has been publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2010, and employs over 6,000 people across more than 30 countries. Akcome appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list as recently as 2022, giving it a stronger documented institutional and financing track record than Austa Energy at this time.
On the product side, Austa Solar concentrates on N-type TOPCon half-cut modules in the 430 W-700 W range, with mass-production efficiency reaching approximately 23% as of early 2024, making it a competitive option for both residential rooftop and mid-scale commercial installations seeking modern cell technology at a value price point. Akcome has carved out a distinct niche as one of the more visible HJT specialists among smaller-volume Chinese manufacturers. Its current portfolio is fully HJT and fully bifacial, with module power running up to 730 W in its latest AK iPower 7.0 series and peak conversion efficiency claimed above 23.5%. HJT's lower temperature coefficient makes Akcome panels particularly attractive for warm-climate ground-mount and utility-adjacent projects where thermal performance matters.
For a typical buyer in 2025, Akcome's longer listed company history, publicly verifiable corporate structure, prior Tier 1 recognition, and differentiated HJT technology give it a modest edge in bankability and technology credibility - especially for commercial or lender-scrutinized projects. Austa Energy is a reasonable budget-to-mid-range TOPCon alternative, but prospective buyers should verify current warranty-service infrastructure given reported after-sales concerns, and confirm whether their financing institution accepts it as a bankable brand.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-21
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers · See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.