AUSTA ENERGY vs AKCOME - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AUSTA ENERGY
India · est. 2015AKCOME
China · est. 2003
Panel models
58
vs
3
Max power
730 W
vs
700 W
Max efficiency
23.50%
vs
22.54%
Bifacial share
62%
vs
100%
At a glance
AUSTA ENERGY has the broader catalog (58 vs 3 models). AUSTA ENERGY leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
AUSTA ENERGY
Website
AUSTA Energy is an Indian solar panel manufacturer based in Surat, Gujarat. The company produces monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar modules for residential and commercial applications, focusing on the domestic Indian market and select export markets.
Headquarters
Surat, India
Founded
2015
Employees
200
Production Capacity
1 GW/year
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
AKCOME
Website
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Founded
2003
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AUSTA ENERGY
|
AKCOME
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 58 +55 | 3 |
| Max Power | 730 W +30 W | 700 W |
| Avg Power | 571 W | 672 W +101 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% +0.96 pp | 22.54% |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.85% +0.23 pp | 21.63% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.295%/°C | -0.240%/°C +0.055 |
| Bifacial Share | 36 (62%) | 3 (100%) +38 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAUSTA ENERGY
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ODA730-33V-MHD Bi | 730W | 23.5% | -0.223%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | ODA725-33V-MHD Bi | 725W | 23.3% | -0.223%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | ODA720-33V-MHD Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.223%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | ODA715-33V-MHD Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.223%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | ODA710-33V-MHD Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.223%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | ODA705-33V-MHD Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.223%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | ODA700-33V-MHD Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.223%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | ODA695-33V-MHD Bi | 695W | 22.4% | -0.223%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | ODA640-30V-MHD Bi | 640W | 22.6% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | ODA635-30V-MHD Bi | 635W | 22.4% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
AKCOME
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SKA611HDGDC-700W Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SKA611HDGDC-660W Bi | 660W | 21.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SKA611HDGDC-655W Bi | 655W | 21.1% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.86%
Temp coeff
-0.236%/°C
Top 3 panels average
Efficiency
21.63%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
AUSTA ENERGY skews to higher efficiency: 7% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
AUSTA ENERGY Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: N-type (47%)
AKCOME Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.