Skip to main content

ASM vs RedSolar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

ASM
Australia Founded 2009
Read the ASM review
VS
RedSolar
China Founded 2008
Read the RedSolar review
At a glance

RedSolar has the broader catalog (41 vs 1 models). RedSolar leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. RedSolar leans bifacial (88% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
1 41
Highest power
170 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
16.0% 23.2%
Average efficiency
16.0% 22.4%
Bifacial share
0% 88%
Average warranty
- 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
ASM

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hallam, Victoria, Australia
Employees
1-10
RedSolar

Hunan Red Solar New Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (RedSolar) is a state-owned high-tech enterprise incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC), one of China's largest Fortune 500 state-owned conglomerates. The company manufactures solar cells, PV modules...

Founded
2008
Headquarters
Changsha, China
Employees
1000-2000
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric ASM RedSolar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 1 41+40
Max Power 170 W 720 W+550 W
Avg Power 170 W 582 W+412 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 16.00% 23.20%+7.20 pp
Avg Efficiency 16.00% 22.36%+6.36 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.438%/°C -0.303%/°C+0.135
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 36 (88%)+88 pp
Avg Warranty - 29.4 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

RedSolar skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

RedSolar offers more 600W+ panels (61% of lineup)

ASM cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
RedSolar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

ASM, trading as Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd, is a small manufacturer based in Australia that assembles monocrystalline PV modules primarily for the domestic residential market. Its catalog, as listed on the ENF Solar panel directory, consists of modules in the 170-200 Wp range built from cells and components imported from Germany, Japan, the United States, and China. ASM does not appear on any BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list found in publicly available sources, and its production footprint is modest by global standards. RedSolar, formally Hunan RedSolar New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., is a state-owned enterprise headquartered in Changsha, Hunan Province, China, incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China's CETC group. Founded in 2008, the company reports having delivered over 30 GW of PV products and operates across more than 50 countries; no confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation was found for RedSolar in 2025 sources either, but its state-backed institutional footprint is substantially larger than ASM's.

ASM's available datasheets reflect a residential rooftop focus, with modules in the 170-200 Wp class. The specific cell technology behind current ASM products is not clearly documented in available public sources. RedSolar's CETC-branded portfolio spans a considerably wider range, from smaller residential configurations around 300 Wp to high-density modules in the 530-550 Wp class suited to commercial rooftops and utility-scale ground mounts. ENF Solar datasheets confirm both monocrystalline and polycrystalline series in RedSolar's catalog, though several older lines are listed as discontinued; the dominant cell technology in its active lineup was not confirmed by available sources.

For most buyers in 2025, RedSolar is the more practical default given its larger scale, broader wattage range, and international deployment record. ASM is best suited to buyers in Australia who specifically require locally assembled panels and do not need high-wattage modern modules. Outside that narrow use case the two brands are not interchangeable - RedSolar operates at a considerably different level of scale and product breadth.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-08

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
ASM A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar RedSolar
Manufacturers
ASM AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO RedSolar
Manufacturers
ASM AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar RedSolar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.