ASM vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 1 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Hallam, Victoria, Australia
- Employees
- 1-10
Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...
- Founded
- 1999
- Headquarters
- Seoul, South Korea
- Annual capacity
- 11.2 GW/year
- Employees
- 2000+
- Listed
- NASDAQ: HQCL
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+
Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)
The flagships
Written summary
Based on my research, ASM (Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd) has very limited public profile data. I'll write an accurate comparison reflecting this asymmetry.
ASM, operating as Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd, is a smaller regional manufacturer headquartered in Australia with a limited public footprint. Published industry databases such as ENF Solar list the company as producing monocrystalline panels, but ASM does not appear on Bloomberg NEF's or S&P Global's Tier 1 bankability lists, and no independent assessment of its annual production scale has surfaced in available industry sources. Its market presence is primarily local to the Australian residential and small commercial segment.
Q-Cells, now formally branded as Hanwha Qcells, is a substantially larger operation. The brand originated in Germany in 1999 and was acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012. It holds Tier 1 status from both Bloomberg NEF and S&P Global's 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech ranking, and operates module production lines spanning roughly 11 GW of annual global capacity, with a major U.S. plant in Cartersville, Georgia rated at 3.3 GW. By any institutional measure, Q-Cells carries the larger and better-documented global footprint.
In terms of product positioning, ASM's catalog, as far as publicly available data shows, covers lower-wattage monocrystalline modules suited to modest residential installations. Q-Cells addresses a broader range of use cases - from premium residential rooftops using its Q.ANTUM TOPCon-based QTron line to utility-scale ground-mount projects - with efficiency ratings reaching up to 23.7% on its highest-performing current series and warranties up to 25 years on both product and performance. For a typical buyer in 2025 seeking bankable, well-warranted panels with broad installer support, Q-Cells is the clearer default choice. ASM may serve buyers with a specific preference for Australian-assembled product, but the two brands are not readily interchangeable in terms of scale, global certification depth, or installer ecosystem.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-19
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.