AIKO vs LEDVANCE - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 124 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. LEDVANCE leans bifacial (62% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600732
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
- Founded
- 2016
- Headquarters
- Garching bei München, Germany
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (48%)
The flagships
Written summary
LEDVANCE is a German lighting and electrical-products brand founded in 2016 as a spin-off from Osram Licht AG, now majority-owned by Chinese conglomerate MLS; it entered the solar market in earnest around 2024 through its LEDVANCE Renewables division and carries no Tier 1 bankability rating. AIKO (Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy), founded in 2009 and headquartered in China with shares listed on the SZSE, achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024, confirming that six or more commercial banks have provided non-recourse project financing against its modules in recent years. With production capacity already exceeding 20 GW and multi-gigawatt expansions actively under construction, AIKO commands a considerably stronger institutional and financial footprint than LEDVANCE, which remains primarily a lighting company with solar as an adjacent product line.
The two portfolios diverge sharply on performance metrics. AIKO's 144-panel lineup averages 23.65% efficiency and 581 Wp per module, peaking at 25.2% and 805 Wp - figures enabled by its proprietary all-back-contact (ABC) cell architecture, which covers nearly 74% of its catalog. Temperature behavior is also better, with a Pmax coefficient of -0.271%/°C versus -0.313%/°C for LEDVANCE, meaning AIKO panels lose less output on hot days. AIKO's average warranty of 29.5 years edges out LEDVANCE's 28.4 years. LEDVANCE, relying primarily on PERC cells (roughly 48% of its catalog), averages 21.57% efficiency and 518 Wp, topping out at 23.4% and 705 Wp. One area where LEDVANCE stands out is bifacial share: 62% of its panels are bifacial versus only 24% for AIKO. That makes the LEDVANCE lineup more relevant for ground-mounted or flat-roof commercial installations where rear-side irradiance gain adds value, while AIKO's high-efficiency, high-wattage monofacial ABC modules suit space-constrained rooftops and premium utility or commercial projects demanding maximum output per square meter.
For most buyers in 2025, AIKO is the clearer default. Its Tier 1 rating simplifies project financing, its ABC technology delivers measurably higher efficiency and a superior temperature coefficient, and its wattage ceiling of 805 Wp addresses both residential-premium and utility-scale demand. LEDVANCE may appeal to installers specifically seeking bifacial PERC panels under a European-branded product line, but the absence of Tier 1 bankability and its shallow solar heritage are meaningful risks for larger financed projects.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers · See 3 LEDVANCE offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.