AEET vs Solarspace - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AEET
HQ unknownSolarspace
China · est. 2011
Panel models
5
vs
82
Max power
200 W
vs
710 W
Max efficiency
15.70%
vs
23.16%
Bifacial share
0%
vs
93%
At a glance
Solarspace has the broader catalog (82 vs 5 models). Solarspace leads on peak efficiency at 23.16%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).
AEET
Headquarters
-
Founded
-
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
Solarspace
Website
SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...
Headquarters
Xuzhou, China
Founded
2011
Employees
6000+
Production Capacity
60+ GW/year
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AEET
|
Solarspace
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 5 | 82 +77 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 710 W +510 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 539 W +349 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.16% +7.46 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.04% +7.14 pp |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.299%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 76 (93%) +93 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 29.6 yrs +4.6 yr |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAEET
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SE200M(24)F | 200W | 15.7% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SE195M(24)F | 195W | 15.3% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SE190M(24)F | 190W | 14.9% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | SE185M(24)F | 185W | 14.5% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | SE180M(24)F | 180W | 14.1% | - | Monocrystalline |
Solarspace
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SS9-66HD-710N Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SS9-66HD-705N Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SS9-66HD-700N Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | SS9-66HD-695N Bi | 695W | 22.4% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | SS9-66HD-690N Bi | 690W | 22.2% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | SS9-66HD-685N Bi | 685W | 22.1% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | SS9-66HD-680N Bi | 680W | 21.9% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | SS9-66HD-675N Bi | 675W | 21.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | SS9-66HD-670N Bi | 670W | 21.6% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | SS9-66HD-670M Bi | 670W | 21.6% | -0.330%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 5 panels average
Efficiency
14.90%
Temp coeff
-
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.15%
Temp coeff
-0.294%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Solarspace skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Solarspace offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)
AEET Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Solarspace Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: N-type (70%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.