AEET vs DAH - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AEET
HQ unknownDAH
China · est. 2009
Panel models
5
vs
356
Max power
200 W
vs
725 W
Max efficiency
15.70%
vs
23.34%
Bifacial share
0%
vs
89%
At a glance
DAH has the broader catalog (356 vs 5 models). DAH leads on peak efficiency at 23.34%. DAH leans bifacial (89% of lineup).
AEET
Headquarters
-
Founded
-
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
DAH
Website
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Founded
2009
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AEET
|
DAH
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 5 | 356 +351 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 725 W +525 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 522 W +332 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.34% +7.64 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.13% +7.23 pp |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.298%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 316 (89%) +89 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 29.5 yrs +4.5 yr |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAEET
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SE200M(24)F | 200W | 15.7% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SE195M(24)F | 195W | 15.3% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SE190M(24)F | 190W | 14.9% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | SE185M(24)F | 185W | 14.5% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | SE180M(24)F | 180W | 14.1% | - | Monocrystalline |
DAH
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DHN-66Y18/DG-725 Bi | 725W | 23.3% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | DHN-66Y18/DG-720 Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | DHN-66Y18/DG-715 Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | DAS-DH132NC-715 Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.280%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | DAS-DH132NC-710 Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.280%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | DHN-66Y18/DG-710 Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | DAS-DH132NC-705 Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.280%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | DHN-66Y18/DG-705 Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | DHN-66Y18/DG-700 Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | DAS-DH132NC-700 Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.280%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 5 panels average
Efficiency
14.90%
Temp coeff
-
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.87%
Temp coeff
-0.286%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
DAH skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
DAH offers more 600W+ panels (23% of lineup)
AEET Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
DAH Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (81%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.