AEET vs AKCOME - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AEET
HQ unknownAKCOME
China · est. 2003
Panel models
5
vs
3
Max power
200 W
vs
700 W
Max efficiency
15.70%
vs
22.54%
Bifacial share
0%
vs
100%
At a glance
AEET has the broader catalog (5 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
AEET
Headquarters
-
Founded
-
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
AKCOME
Website
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Founded
2003
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AEET
|
AKCOME
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 5 +2 | 3 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 700 W +500 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 672 W +482 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 22.54% +6.84 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 21.63% +6.73 pp |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.240%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs +5.0 yr |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAEET
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SE200M(24)F | 200W | 15.7% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SE195M(24)F | 195W | 15.3% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SE190M(24)F | 190W | 14.9% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | SE185M(24)F | 185W | 14.5% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | SE180M(24)F | 180W | 14.1% | - | Monocrystalline |
AKCOME
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SKA611HDGDC-700W Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SKA611HDGDC-660W Bi | 660W | 21.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SKA611HDGDC-655W Bi | 655W | 21.1% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 5 panels average
Efficiency
14.90%
Temp coeff
-
Top 3 panels average
Efficiency
21.63%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
AEET Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
AKCOME Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
Other Manufacturer Comparisons
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.