Solaria vs AKCOME - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Solaria has the broader catalog (27 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Solaria is a leading European company focused on developing and generating solar photovoltaic energy. The company aims to contribute to decarbonization by creating a global energy model based on clean energy. Solaria specializes in the implementation and development of solar photovoltaic technology, from manufacturing...
- Founded
- 2002
- Headquarters
- Madrid, Spain
- Annual capacity
- 1.658 GW/year
- Employees
- 235
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (19%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
Solaria, founded in 2002 and listed on the Madrid Stock Exchange (BME), is a Spanish solar manufacturer with a reported production capacity of 1.658 GW and a workforce of 235 employees. AKCOME, founded in 2003 and headquartered in China's Zhejiang Province, operates a 6 GW panel factory in Huzhou and is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. On institutional standing, Solaria carries a meaningful advantage in European markets: its BME listing and EIB-backed financing frameworks give it a visible track record with project lenders. AKCOME, by contrast, is currently not classified as Tier 1 bankable by BloombergNEF, a gap that can slow non-recourse financing for large projects even where the technology itself is sound.
Solaria's 27-panel catalog averages 435.9 Wp and 19.96% efficiency, topping out at 680 Wp and 21.92% - a respectable but mid-range position. Only around 19% of the lineup is bifacial, and its dominant cell technology is not publicly detailed, pointing to a portfolio calibrated for mainstream residential and light-commercial rooftops rather than ground-mount utility work. Warranties average 26.5 years. AKCOME's three tracked products are an entirely different animal: 100% bifacial, 100% HJT, averaging 671.7 Wp and 21.63% efficiency with a top module at 700 Wp and 22.54%. Its temperature coefficient of -0.24%/C per Pmax is markedly better than Solaria's -0.36%/C, meaning meaningfully less power loss in hot-climate installations. A 30-year warranty across the range reinforces AKCOME's pitch to buyers who want longevity-focused, high-yield ground-mount or commercial flat-roof deployments.
For a typical buyer in 2025, Solaria is the safer default for EU residential and commercial rooftop work, where a European-listed manufacturer and broad module variety simplify both procurement and grid-connection paperwork. AKCOME offers genuinely superior specifications - the HJT efficiency edge and thermal stability are real differentiators - but the absent Tier 1 rating is a material constraint for any project requiring institutional debt financing. Self-financed corporate or industrial buyers, and those in markets where Sinosure-backed credit is acceptable, will find AKCOME's numbers hard to match at comparable price points.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-11
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 1 Solaria offer · See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.