Skip to main content

Sirius PV vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Sirius PV
Turkey Founded 2021
Read the Sirius PV review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 340
Highest power
0 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
- 24.8%
Average efficiency
- 21.7%
Bifacial share
0% 43%
Average warranty
- 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Sirius PV

Sirius PV is a solar photovoltaic module manufacturer established in 2021 as a brand and subsidiary of Elin A.Ş., a Turkish industrial group founded in 1981. The company operates multiple automated production facilities across Europe and the United States, with a combined capacity of over 3.5 GW, positioning itself as...

Founded
2021
Headquarters
Ankara, Turkey
Annual capacity
3-5 GW/year
Employees
500-1000
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Sirius PV Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 340+340
Max Power 0 W 760 W+760 W
Avg Power 0 W 520 W+520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 24.80%
Avg Efficiency - 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 145 (43%)+43 pp
Avg Warranty - 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

Sirius PV cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
Sirius PV all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Sirius PV was established in 2021 as a brand under Elin Energy, a Turkish industrial group with roots going back to 1981. The company operates manufacturing facilities in Turkey and opened an additional assembly plant in Texas, United States, in 2024. It claims a combined production capacity of up to 3.5 GW across three factories, a top bankability ranking in Europe, and commercial presence in more than 40 countries. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, and has grown into one of the world's largest vertically integrated module producers, with annual manufacturing capacity exceeding 80 GW and cumulative global shipments surpassing 225 GW as of early 2025. Trina Solar is a consistent fixture on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list and has received a 100 percent bankability rating in independent module bankability assessments. In terms of institutional trust and scale, Trina Solar holds a substantially stronger global footprint.

Sirius PV's product range centers on N-type TOPCon bifacial half-cut modules in both glass-backsheet and glass-glass configurations, with efficiencies reaching roughly 21 percent. The lineup is suited primarily to residential rooftop and light commercial installations, and the European manufacturing origin can be an advantage when project lenders require non-Asian supply chains. Trina Solar covers a broader spectrum: the Vertex S+ family (NEG9R series, 430-460 W) targets residential and commercial rooftops with i-TOPCon technology and the latest G3 generation pushing efficiencies up to 24.3 percent, while larger-format Vertex N modules serve utility-scale ground-mount projects. Trina backs its panels with a 30-year linear performance warranty capped at a maximum degradation of 0.35 percent per year.

For most international buyers - whether a residential installer, a C&I developer, or a project finance team - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default owing to its decades-long track record, deep Tier 1 bankability documentation, and global spare-parts and service network. Sirius PV is a credible option where European or US domestic production is a contractual or political requirement, but it cannot yet match Trina Solar's scale, technology roadmap depth, or independent third-party validation history. The two brands are not interchangeable in institutional contexts, though for a straightforward rooftop installation either will perform reliably given comparable technology.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-07-07

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Sirius PV A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Sirius PV AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Sirius PV AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 211 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.