Skip to main content

Sharp vs AE Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Sharp
Japan Founded 1912 Tier 1
Read the Sharp review
VS
AE Solar
Germany Founded 2003 Tier 1
Read the AE Solar review
At a glance

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 19 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
19 646
Highest power
740 Wp 730 Wp
Best efficiency
23.8% 24.4%
Average efficiency
22.2% 21.1%
Bifacial share
53% 63%
Average warranty
28 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Sharp

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.

Founded
1912
Headquarters
Sakai, Osaka Prefecture, Japan
Annual capacity
15.4 GW/year
Employees
40,123
Listed
TYO: 6753
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
AE Solar

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

Founded
2003
Headquarters
Gersthofen, Germany
Annual capacity
2+ GW/year
Employees
501-1000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Sharp AE Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 19 646+627
Max Power 740 W+10 W 730 W
Avg Power 576 W+87 W 489 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.82% 24.43%+0.61 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.20%+1.09 pp 21.11%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.300%/°C+0.012 -0.312%/°C
Bifacial Share 10 (53%) 405 (63%)+10 pp
Avg Warranty 27.6 yrs 29.7 yrs+2.1 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)

Sharp cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (37%)

AE Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (54%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AE Solar was founded in 2003 by Alexander Maier in Königsbrunn, Germany, growing from a family-run business into one of Europe's most recognized solar module manufacturers. The company maintains its headquarters in Germany while operating manufacturing plants in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with a combined annual production capacity of approximately 2.5 GW. AE Solar holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and was ranked 18th out of 67 evaluated manufacturers in the Global PV Module and Inverter Bankability 2024 report - identified as the sole European Tier 1 producer with high bankability that year, with its bankability rating rising from 26% in 2023 to 50% in 2024. Sharp, by contrast, is a Japanese electronics conglomerate with over 60 years of solar manufacturing history, having produced its first photovoltaic cells in the 1950s. Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation (SESJ), headquartered in Japan, distributes panels across Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the UK, but is not currently sold in the United States. Sharp does not appear in recent publicly available BloombergNEF Tier 1 confirmations, giving AE Solar the stronger institutional standing of the two.

AE Solar serves residential rooftop, commercial C&I, and utility-scale segments. Its Aurora series uses P-type PERC technology, while the Meteor series is built on N-type TOPCon cells - the Meteor earned a five-star rating in PV Magazine module testing and received the Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award 2025, underscoring its suitability for demanding projects. Sharp's current lineup spans standard residential modules up to high-power commercial panels in the 610 W range, the latest of which also use N-type TOPCon technology. Sharp carries a 30-year performance warranty guaranteeing 87.5% output retention by year 30, which ranks among the stronger guarantees in the industry. Both brands target overlapping end-use segments, though Sharp positions itself at the premium end of the price scale.

For international buyers, AE Solar offers a well-documented Tier 1 track record, competitive pricing relative to its European brand positioning, and independently verified module performance - making it a strong choice for projects where bankability and installer-network support are priorities. Sharp's long brand heritage and robust warranty terms appeal to buyers valuing institutional longevity, particularly in commercial or public-sector projects. For most residential and light commercial rooftop applications the two brands are broadly comparable in cell technology, with AE Solar currently holding a clearer and better-documented advantage in European bankability.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Sharp A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AEET AE Solar
Manufacturers
Sharp AIKO
Manufacturers
AKCOME AE Solar
Manufacturers
Sharp ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AE Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 6 Sharp offers · See 5 AE Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.