Skip to main content

Renesola vs Runergy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Renesola
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the Renesola review
VS
Runergy
China Founded 2013 Tier 1
Read the Runergy review
At a glance

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 115 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
115 124
Highest power
720 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
23.5% 24.1%
Average efficiency
21.7% 22.4%
Bifacial share
61% 77%
Average warranty
30 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Renesola

Renesola, established in 2005, is a pioneer in the global new energy field, committed to mitigating global warming and providing quality power station solutions for global clients. They offer one-stop solutions including development, financing, design, construction, operation, and maintenance, along with...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
16.5+ GW/year
Employees
100-500
Listed
NYSE: SOL
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Runergy

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...

Founded
2013
Headquarters
Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, China
Annual capacity
23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year
Employees
15,000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Renesola Runergy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 115 124+9
Max Power 720 W 740 W+20 W
Avg Power 514 W 579 W+65 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.51% 24.10%+0.59 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.67% 22.42%+0.75 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -0.298%/°C+0.006
Bifacial Share 70 (61%) 95 (77%)+16 pp
Avg Warranty 29.7 yrs+0.6 yr 29.1 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)

Renesola cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: N-type (77%)

Runergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: N-type (60%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Renesola is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2005 in Zhejiang, initially as a silicon wafer producer before launching its own branded modules in 2007 and listing on the NYSE in 2008. The company has cited roughly 25 GW of historical global shipments and has appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list in the past, including with an annual capacity figure around 5,000 MW as of Q2 2026, though BNEF's quarterly Tier 1 list can exclude manufacturers that trip solvency or default criteria, and Renesola has a documented history of financial strain that slowed its expansion after early rapid growth. Runergy, based in Jiangsu, China, is a newer but fast-scaling player that has held BNEF Tier 1 status for multiple consecutive quarters through 2025, has shipped over 65 GW of solar cells cumulatively, and has expanded manufacturing beyond China into Thailand, Vietnam and a new US facility in Huntsville, Alabama. On institutional footprint, Runergy currently presents the stronger and more consistently verified bankability profile, while Renesola's standing has been more variable due to its financial history.

Renesola's catalog spans semi-mono, polycrystalline and monocrystalline panels along with string inverters, microinverters and LED lighting, with residential-oriented lines like the RS41 and RS41H series aimed at rooftop installations, particularly in markets such as Australia where the brand built early market share. Runergy is more narrowly focused and technologically aggressive, concentrating on n-type TOPCon cells, with certified module efficiencies pushed to around 26.9 percent in its latest generation; its lineup covers black-frame residential and commercial rooftop modules alongside large-format bifacial dual-glass modules such as the HY-DH144N8 series built for utility-scale ground-mount projects.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Runergy is generally the more defensible default choice given its more consistent Tier 1 bankability track record, newer TOPCon technology, and active manufacturing expansion, making it better suited to both utility-scale and premium rooftop applications. Renesola remains a viable option, especially where its established residential product lines and regional certifications are already in use, but its more turbulent financial history warrants closer due diligence, particularly for large or bank-financed projects.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-08-27

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Renesola A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Runergy
Manufacturers
Renesola AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Runergy
Manufacturers
Renesola AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Runergy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 1 Renesola offer · See 5 Runergy offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.