Q-SUN Solar vs A.B. Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Q-SUN Solar has the broader catalog (111 vs 0 models). Q-SUN Solar leans bifacial (68% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Qn-SOLAR officially launched its global PV business in 2022. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China, and has four manufacturing bases in China. As a professional and integrated company, Qn-SOLAR operates in various fields of PV upstream and downstream, achieving an annual production capacity of 20GW PV cells...
- Founded
- 2014
- Headquarters
- China
ABO Energy is a renewable energy company that develops and constructs renewable energy projects, focusing on wind, solar, and storage facilities. They offer turnkey solutions and have connected several gigawatts of nominal output to the grid. The company is active internationally and is committed to driving the energy...
- Founded
- 1996
- Headquarters
- Wiesbaden, Germany
- Employees
- 1,400
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Q-SUN Solar skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+
Q-SUN Solar offers more 600W+ panels (30% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (42%)
The flagships
Written summary
Q-SUN Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2014, headquartered in Chuzhou, Anhui Province, with its international marketing center in Nanjing. The company operates production facilities across China (Tianchang, Yancheng) and has expanded internationally to Oman and Bulgaria. It reports annual module output in the range of 4 GW or above, giving it a meaningful mid-tier footprint in global PV supply. Q-SUN holds ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001 certifications, and its manufacturing processes carry TUV Germany approval under IEC standards. However, no explicit BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability classification was confirmed through available sources as of mid-2026. A.B. Energy did not surface in any credible industry database, analyst report, or independent review consulted for this comparison, which strongly suggests it is either a very small regional brand, a recently incorporated entity, or operates under a different trade name in major markets. On institutional footprint, Q-SUN Solar holds the clearer advantage by a wide margin.
Q-SUN Solar's current lineup centers on its Mercury Series, an N-type TOPCon product line covering outputs from roughly 400 W to 720 W in mono-facial, bifacial transparent-backsheet, and bifacial double-glass configurations. The company also offers the Onyx Series, a full-black aesthetic module aimed at residential rooftops, and has announced mass production of 0BB (zero busbar) technology. These products span utility-scale ground mounts, commercial rooftops, and premium residential applications. Because no verified product information is available for A.B. Energy, no equivalent technology or use-case breakdown can be offered without risk of misrepresentation.
For a typical buyer in 2025-2026, Q-SUN Solar is the more documentable choice between the two: it has verifiable production scale, confirmed certifications, and an established TOPCon roadmap. A.B. Energy cannot be recommended or dismissed on merit until independent sourcing confirms its existence and product specifications. Buyers should request certified datasheets and third-party test results directly from A.B. Energy before any procurement decision.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-16
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.