Skip to main content

Mysolar USA vs Sharp - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Mysolar USA
China Founded 2010
Read the Mysolar USA review
VS
Sharp
Japan Founded 1912 Tier 1
Read the Sharp review
At a glance

Sharp has the broader catalog (19 vs 15 models). Sharp leads on peak efficiency at 23.82%. Mysolar USA leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
15 19
Highest power
720 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% 23.8%
Average efficiency
22.4% 22.2%
Bifacial share
100% 53%
Average warranty
30 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Mysolar USA

Mysolar is a sub-brand of Mamibot, specializing in designing and manufacturing high-efficiency solar panels using state-of-the-art technology. The company aims to become a Tier 1 solar panel manufacturer, offering a wide range of modules for residential and commercial projects. Mysolar is committed to rewriting the...

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
3.2 GW/year
Employees
60
Sharp

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.

Founded
1912
Headquarters
Sakai, Osaka Prefecture, Japan
Annual capacity
15.4 GW/year
Employees
40,123
Listed
TYO: 6753
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Mysolar USA Sharp
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 15 19+4
Max Power 720 W 740 W+20 W
Avg Power 610 W+34 W 576 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.17% 23.82%+0.65 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.42%+0.22 pp 22.20%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.283%/°C+0.017 -0.300%/°C
Bifacial Share 15 (100%)+47 pp 10 (53%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+2.4 yr 27.6 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Mysolar USA offers more 600W+ panels (67% of lineup)

Mysolar USA cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (67%)

Sharp cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (37%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Mysolar USA is a relatively young solar brand operated under Mamibot, an American-registered company with manufacturing ties to Shanghai, China. It is not currently recognized on established Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability lists and instead markets itself as an aspiring Tier 1 manufacturer that offers tier-2 pricing, with panels spanning poly, mono, bifacial and shingled formats and stated power ranges up to roughly 730 W. Sharp, by contrast, is a long-established Japanese electronics conglomerate with over six decades of solar experience and a history of genuine Tier 1 status during its peak manufacturing years, though the company progressively withdrew from Western solar markets between 2012 and 2015 as Chinese competitors drove down prices, and its solar division now operates mainly through Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation for the Japanese domestic market. Sharp holds the clearer institutional footprint on paper, built on decades of brand recognition and prior global scale, even though that footprint is now largely historical outside Japan, while Mysolar represents a newer, smaller-scale entrant still building its reputation.

In terms of product fit, Mysolar's shingled, bifacial and HJT-technology panels are generally positioned toward budget-conscious residential and small commercial rooftop installations in the United States, aiming to undercut established Tier 1 brands on price while promising long warranty terms of 25 to 30 years. Sharp's relevant panels, such as the older Sunsnap series and newer higher-efficiency modules like the NU-JC440 using half-cut, IBC, MBB and HJT cell designs, were historically aimed at premium residential and coastal-region installations, with corrosion-resistant coatings suited to salt exposure, but these products are essentially unavailable to new buyers in North America and Europe today.

For a typical solar buyer in the United States in 2025, Sharp is not a practical option since its panels are no longer sold or actively distributed in this market, making Mysolar the only realistically purchasable choice between the two despite its unproven long-term track record and lack of confirmed Tier 1 or BloombergNEF status. Buyers considering Mysolar should weigh its lower price and technology variety against the limited independent verification of its bankability and durability compared to well-established current Tier 1 manufacturers.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-09-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Mysolar USA A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Sharp
Manufacturers
Mysolar USA AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Sharp
Manufacturers
Mysolar USA AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Sharp
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 6 Sharp offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.