Skip to main content

MWG vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison

MWG
Poland Founded 2005
Read the MWG review
VS
AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 2 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
2 144
Highest power
400 Wp 805 Wp
Best efficiency
20.1% 25.2%
Average efficiency
19.7% 23.7%
Bifacial share
0% 24%
Average warranty
25 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
MWG

MW Power is a Polish brand operating under MPL Group, offering a range of technology products including photovoltaic panels sold under the MW Green Power (MWG) brand. Their solar modules are small-wattage units (10W–100W) made from monocrystalline silicon, primarily intended for autonomous and off-grid energy systems...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Zabrze, Poland
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric MWG AIKO
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 2 144+142
Max Power 400 W 805 W+405 W
Avg Power 370 W 581 W+211 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 20.12% 25.20%+5.08 pp
Avg Efficiency 19.72% 23.65%+3.93 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.390%/°C -0.271%/°C+0.119
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 35 (24%)+24 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 29.5 yrs+4.5 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

MWG cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

MWG is a brand for which no reliable, independently verifiable industry profile could be located across major industry databases, Tier 1 lists, or trade press outlets consulted for this comparison. No BloombergNEF bankability classification, disclosed production-capacity figure, or sustained media coverage was found under that brand name. AIKO Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in the mid-1990s and headquartered in Guangdong province, with a vertically integrated production network spanning multiple gigafactories across Yiwu, Foshan, Zhuhai, and Jinan. AIKO achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 and, according to Tier 1 tracking sources, had roughly 20 GW of annual cell and module capacity in early 2025, growing substantially through 2026. On institutional footprint, AIKO holds a clear and documentable advantage over a brand whose public profile cannot be confirmed.

AIKO's product identity is anchored around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell architecture, which eliminates front-side metal busbars to maximize active cell area and combines amorphous-silicon passivation with a back-contact layout. Its flagship Neostar residential series reaches module efficiencies in the 22-24 percent range, and AIKO has consistently topped the Taiyangnews global module efficiency rankings since early 2023. The technology is best suited to space-constrained residential rooftops and premium commercial installations where high energy yield per square meter justifies a slight price premium over mainstream TOPCon or PERC alternatives. AIKO also maintains a European R&D presence through Solarlab AIKO Europe in Freiburg, Germany, which supports bankability for project finance in Western markets.

For a typical buyer in 2025 evaluating these two brands, AIKO is the only one for which meaningful due diligence is currently possible - its Tier 1 status, warranty terms, and technology roadmap are all on public record. Until MWG can be verified through independent industry sources, it cannot be responsibly recommended alongside a confirmed Tier 1 manufacturer for financed or warranty-dependent installations.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-09

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
MWG A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
MWG AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME AIKO
Manufacturers
MWG ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AIKO
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 MWG offers · See 166 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.