Luxor vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600732
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)
The flagships
Written summary
AIKO is a Chinese manufacturer that has built its reputation around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell architecture, which places all electrical contacts on the rear of the cell to eliminate front-side shading losses. The company reached BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in 2024 and reported a production capacity of around 20 GW as of early 2025, placing it firmly among the larger-scale module makers. Luxor Solar GmbH, founded in 2007 and headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany, is a European brand that manufactures its panels in China and distributes across more than 85 countries. Luxor claims a production capacity of roughly 6.8 GW and has repeatedly earned the EuPD Research "Top Brand PV" seal in Germany, though no search result confirmed a BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation for Luxor. On institutional scale and bankability documentation, AIKO currently carries the stronger footprint.
The two brands target somewhat different customer segments. AIKO's main residential line, the Neostar series, offers module efficiencies up to 24.3% and is aimed at space-constrained rooftops where maximising output per square metre justifies a premium price; its Comet series (600-630 W range) addresses commercial and industrial rooftops. The ABC platform also delivers an unusually low temperature coefficient of around -0.26%/°C and a first-year degradation of no more than 1%, which matters in hot climates. Luxor's portfolio leans more toward the mainstream European residential and commercial segments, with TOPCon cells featured in a significant share of newer models and a reported 66% bifacial ratio across its catalogue. Luxor's panels span a broad wattage range and the brand emphasises long warranty terms of up to 30 years alongside a very low field complaint rate.
For a buyer in 2025 who needs the highest possible efficiency in a limited roof area and is willing to pay a premium, AIKO's ABC panels are a compelling choice, particularly in markets where they have strong installer support such as Australia. For a European buyer prioritising a locally recognised brand with a wide product range, proven distributor networks, and competitive mainstream pricing, Luxor remains a solid and well-regarded option. The two brands are not genuinely interchangeable - AIKO sits at the premium high-efficiency tier while Luxor occupies the reliable mid-to-upper mainstream segment.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-25
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.