LS Solar vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 2 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+
Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
The flagships
Written summary
LS Solar is a brand with a limited public footprint in the major industry sources consulted for this comparison - including BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, PV Tech, and pv-magazine. Web searches suggest a possible association with South Korea's LS Electric, part of the LS Group conglomerate headquartered in Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, which operates a PV system product line and has completed large-scale solar projects in South Korea and Japan. However, "LS Solar" does not appear consistently in bankability rankings or independent module reviews, so its institutional footprint remains difficult to verify from public sources. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a well-documented Chinese manufacturer founded in December 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange STAR Market, and consistently rated Tier 1 by BloombergNEF. With annual production capacity of approximately 100 GW and cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW across more than 160 countries, Trina Solar carries one of the strongest institutional profiles in the global PV industry.
Trina Solar has built its current portfolio around TOPCon cell technology across all market segments. The Vertex S+ G3 dual-glass series targets residential rooftops and small commercial rooftops, while the flagship Vertex N and Vertex NG series - reaching up to 760 W output and 24.5% efficiency - are engineered for utility-scale ground-mount and large C&I applications. The company is actively rolling out what it calls its TOPCon 2.0 generation, positioning itself at the leading edge of mainstream cell efficiency. For LS Solar, publicly available sources do not provide sufficient detail to characterize its current module portfolio or dominant cell technology with confidence, making a product-level comparison unreliable.
For most international buyers - project developers, EPC contractors, or commercial installers - Trina Solar is the clearly verifiable choice, backed by bankability ratings, a dense global distribution network, and a long track record with independent performance testing. LS Solar may represent a legitimate option in specific regional contexts, but buyers should conduct their own due-diligence before committing to a supplier whose public industry profile is limited.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-29
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 241 Trina Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.