LS Solar vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 2 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600732
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)
The flagships
Written summary
AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer that has grown rapidly into a recognized premium brand, achieving BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 - a designation based on financing non-recourse projects across multiple international banks. The company has scaled its production capacity to approximately 20 GW per year as of early 2025, with projections pointing toward further expansion. LS Solar Pte. Ltd., by contrast, is a Singapore-incorporated company established in 2009 that operates a module assembly facility in Laos with a reported capacity of around 500 MW. LS Solar does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, and its institutional footprint is substantially smaller. On the dimension of bankability and scale, AIKO holds a clear advantage.
AIKO's principal differentiator is its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell architecture, which relocates all metal contacts to the rear of the cell and enables module efficiencies above 25% in its Gen 3 Neostar series. The technology also delivers a low temperature coefficient of around -0.26 degrees C per percent, meaning less power loss during hot weather compared with conventional TOPCon panels. AIKO is positioned firmly at the premium end of the market - targeting performance-sensitive residential rooftops and commercial installations where maximizing yield per square meter justifies a higher upfront cost. The brand took the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Award in Australia and ranked as a Top Performer in six of seven PVEL scorecard categories. LS Solar's catalog is oriented around smaller-scale modules in the 100 W-450 W range, and the company also distributes inverters, charge controllers, and street-lighting systems, suggesting a focus on off-grid and distributed applications in Southeast Asian markets rather than grid-tied premium segments.
For a buyer evaluating grid-tied residential or commercial projects in 2025 and 2026, AIKO is the stronger default choice of the two, given its verified bankability, leading cell technology, and independent performance validation. LS Solar may be relevant for smaller distributed or off-grid projects in Southeast Asia where logistics and local support matter more than peak efficiency ratings, but the two brands are not interchangeable for utility or mainstream rooftop applications.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-21
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.