Skip to main content

Leapton vs Runergy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Leapton
Japan Founded 2012 Tier 1
Read the Leapton review
VS
Runergy
China Founded 2013 Tier 1
Read the Runergy review
At a glance

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 119 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
119 124
Highest power
720 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
23.3% 24.1%
Average efficiency
22.2% 22.4%
Bifacial share
49% 77%
Average warranty
29 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Leapton

Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide.

Founded
2012
Headquarters
Kobe, Japan
Annual capacity
3+ GW/year
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Runergy

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...

Founded
2013
Headquarters
Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, China
Annual capacity
23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year
Employees
15,000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Leapton Runergy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 119 124+5
Max Power 720 W 740 W+20 W
Avg Power 546 W 579 W+33 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.32% 24.10%+0.78 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.18% 22.42%+0.24 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.307%/°C -0.298%/°C+0.008
Bifacial Share 58 (49%) 95 (77%)+28 pp
Avg Warranty 29.5 yrs+0.4 yr 29.1 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)

Leapton cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (88%)

Runergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (60%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...
06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Leapton A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Runergy
Manufacturers
Leapton AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Runergy
Manufacturers
Leapton AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Runergy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 8 Leapton offers · See 4 Runergy offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.