Skip to main content

Kensol vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Kensol
Poland Founded 2014
Read the Kensol review
VS
AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 21 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Kensol leans bifacial (81% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
21 144
Highest power
460 Wp 805 Wp
Best efficiency
23.0% 25.2%
Average efficiency
22.0% 23.7%
Bifacial share
81% 24%
Average warranty
29 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Kensol

Kensol is a Polish company founded in 2014 that focuses on providing innovative, ecological, and economical solutions for the renewable energy sector. They design equipment tailored to the needs of the Polish market, specializing in photovoltaic (PV) and heating (HVAC) systems. Kensol offers modern and integrated...

Founded
2014
Headquarters
Gliwice, Poland
Annual capacity
null GW/year
Employees
null
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Kensol AIKO
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 21 144+123
Max Power 460 W 805 W+345 W
Avg Power 437 W 581 W+144 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.00% 25.20%+2.20 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.04% 23.65%+1.61 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.296%/°C -0.271%/°C+0.026
Bifacial Share 17 (81%)+57 pp 35 (24%)
Avg Warranty 29.0 yrs 29.5 yrs+0.5 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

Kensol cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (29%)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer that achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024, placing it among the most bankable module suppliers globally - a designation fewer than 2% of the roughly 17,000 solar companies worldwide attain. The company has reported a nameplate production capacity of approximately 20 GW and shipped more than 2 GW of modules in the first quarter of 2025 alone, signaling meaningful industrial scale. Kensol is a Polish manufacturer operating under its parent company Keno Sp. z o.o., based in Gliwice, Poland. Kensol does not appear on any BloombergNEF Tier 1 list found in public sources, and its production scale and project-finance track record are not publicly documented - which is typical of smaller regional players. By institutional footprint, AIKO carries considerably more weight in project financing and large procurement decisions.

AIKO's core product line is built around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) n-type cell technology, which places all electrical contacts on the rear of the cell to maximize light absorption. This positions the brand firmly in the premium segment - targeting residential rooftops where space efficiency and aesthetics matter, and commercial and industrial installations via its Infinite series, which reaches approximately 500 W per module at around 25% module efficiency. Kensol, by contrast, produces monocrystalline PERC panels in the 395-475 Wp range. PERC is a more mature, cost-competitive technology well suited to budget-conscious residential or small commercial installations, primarily within the European market where the brand appears to focus its distribution.

For most buyers in 2025, AIKO is the stronger default - particularly where project financing, long-term warranty assurance, or premium efficiency on constrained rooftops is a factor. Kensol may appeal to buyers in Poland or Central Europe who value regional manufacturer proximity and a lower cost entry point, but it lacks the bankability credentials and technological differentiation that underpin AIKO's market position.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-28

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Kensol A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
Kensol AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME AIKO
Manufacturers
Kensol ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AIKO
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 3 Kensol offers · See 170 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.