Jinko Solar vs ZNShine - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 212 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...
- Founded
- 1988
- Headquarters
- Suqian, China
- Annual capacity
- 10 GW/year
- Employees
- 1,200
- Listed
- NEEQ: 838463
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (63%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jinko Solar and ZNShine are both China-based, Tier 1 bankable solar module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, has grown into one of the world's largest photovoltaic manufacturers, with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce exceeding 33,000 employees. The company secured the top global ranking in module shipments in H1 2025 and has been a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years. ZNShine, by contrast, was founded much earlier - in 1988 - giving it a longer operating history, though it remains a significantly smaller player with a production capacity of 10 GW, approximately 1,200 employees, and a listing on China's NEEQ over-the-counter market rather than a major international exchange.
On the technology side, Jinko Solar's portfolio is increasingly built around N-type TOPCon cells, which account for roughly 39% of its 545-panel lineup and enable a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and an average of 22.0%. The company's average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C is notably better than ZNShine's -0.329%/°C, translating into stronger real-world output during hot weather - a meaningful advantage in utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects where annual energy yield drives return on investment. ZNShine's portfolio leans primarily on PERC technology (over 63% of its 212 panels), achieving a maximum efficiency of 22.83% and an average of 21.3%. Where ZNShine stands out is in its higher share of bifacial modules (42% of the lineup versus 32% for Jinko) and a higher average panel wattage of approximately 534 Wp, alongside a proprietary graphene-coated glass offering self-cleaning properties - a differentiator for large rooftop or agricultural installations in dusty or hard-to-access environments.
For international buyers and project developers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar offers stronger brand recognition, deeper financial backing, broader third-party certification data, and a clear technology roadmap anchored in TOPCon and beyond. ZNShine represents a credible value-oriented alternative for buyers who prioritize bifacial yield and lower upfront module cost and are comfortable with a smaller, less globally visible supplier. Both carry comparable product warranty terms - around 28 years on average - which partially closes the perceived quality gap for risk-tolerant buyers.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-08
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers · See 12 ZNShine offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.