Jinko Solar vs TommaTech - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 7 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar panel manufacturers, listed on the NYSE with over 33,800 employees and a production capacity of 130 GW. The company holds Tier 1 (bankable) status, making its modules eligible for projects financed by major lending institutions worldwide. TommaTech is a Turkish manufacturer operating under the CW Enerji group, with an annual production capacity of approximately 1.8 GW and no Tier 1 certification. While TommaTech maintains a German engineering and distribution presence that broadens its European reach, its global footprint and independent verification track record are far more limited than Jinko's - which has surpassed 300 GW of cumulative installations worldwide and earned 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer designations.
Jinko Solar offers a broad portfolio of 545 panel models, covering everything from standard residential modules to high-power units reaching 735 Wp and peak efficiencies of 24.8%. Approximately 39% of its lineup uses N-type TOPCon cell technology, and around 32% of its modules are bifacial - a meaningful advantage for utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects seeking higher energy yield per installed area. The average efficiency across Jinko's portfolio is approximately 22.0%, with a temperature coefficient averaging -0.308%/°C. TommaTech's portfolio is narrower - just 7 models - but is entirely composed of N-type TOPCon panels, with an average efficiency of approximately 22.65% and a temperature coefficient of -0.30%/°C. Its flagship 600 Wp module achieves a module efficiency of 23.23%, and the company provides a 30-year performance warranty, slightly above Jinko's portfolio average of approximately 28.5 years. TommaTech's monofacial-only lineup suits residential rooftop installations where bifaciality adds limited value, while Jinko's diverse range supports both rooftop and large-scale ground-mount deployments.
For international buyers, the choice between the two largely depends on project scale and financing structure. Jinko Solar is the logical selection for utility-scale, C&I, or any project requiring bankability from institutional lenders, backed by a global supply chain and a proven quality track record. TommaTech presents a viable alternative for smaller residential or light commercial installations in European markets - particularly where buyers prefer sourcing from a non-Chinese manufacturer with European engineering credentials - but its limited model range and absence of Tier 1 status make it less suitable for large or externally financed projects.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.