Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs TN Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
TN Solar
Headquarters not published
Read the TN Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 10 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. TN Solar leans bifacial (50% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 10
Highest power
735 Wp 715 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.0%
Average efficiency
22.2% 21.1%
Bifacial share
36% 50%
Average warranty
29 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar TN Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+627 10
Max Power 735 W+20 W 715 W
Avg Power 523 W 542 W+20 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.78 pp 23.02%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+1.09 pp 21.08%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -0.280%/°C+0.024
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 5 (50%)+14 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs 30.0 yrs+1.3 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

TN Solar offers more 600W+ panels (50% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

TN Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (50%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and TN Solar are both Chinese solar module manufacturers, but they differ substantially in scale, market standing, and global reach. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, employs 33,830 people and operates with a production capacity of 130 GW - placing it among the world's largest solar panel manufacturers. Its Tier 1 bankable status reflects strong financial standing and independently verified product quality, facilitating access to project financing across all market segments. TN Solar is a considerably smaller producer without Tier 1 designation, offering a catalogue of just 10 panels - suggesting a focus on niche, OEM, or emerging export markets rather than broad global distribution. The company holds ISO 9001, CE, and TUV certifications and produces modules across PERC, TOPCon, and HJT technologies.

Jinko Solar's portfolio is anchored by TOPCon cell technology (39.4% of its 545-panel range), with a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a portfolio average of 22.0%. The Tiger Neo series has earned 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer awards from 2015 through 2025 and surpassed 200 GW in cumulative shipments by mid-2025 - making it the bestselling single solar module series in PV industry history. A bifacial share of 31.9% and an average temperature coefficient of -0.31%/°C support versatile deployment across residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial C&I projects, and ground-mount utility-scale farms worldwide. TN Solar, by contrast, concentrates on HJT technology (50% of its catalogue), achieving a maximum efficiency of 23.02% and a portfolio average of 21.08%. Its temperature coefficient of -0.28%/°C is marginally superior, indicating better performance retention in high-heat environments, while its 50% bifacial share and average warranty of 30 years - compared to 28.5 years for Jinko Solar - may appeal in premium residential and commercial applications where long-term yield guarantees carry weight.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision comes down to risk profile and procurement requirements. Jinko Solar's Tier 1 status, large production scale, extensive certification history, and documented reliability record make it the standard choice for bankable utility-scale projects, institutional procurement, or any installation requiring financeable and auditable supplier credentials. TN Solar's HJT technology and marginally better temperature coefficient could attract buyers in premium C&I or residential segments who prioritize low-irradiance performance and extended warranty terms, but the absence of Tier 1 recognition and a limited public track record necessitate careful due diligence before committing to large-volume or long-term supply contracts.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar TN Solar
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO TN Solar
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar TN Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.