Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Solarspace - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Solarspace
China Founded 2011 Tier 1
Read the Solarspace review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 82 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 82
Highest power
735 Wp 710 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.2%
Average efficiency
22.2% 22.0%
Bifacial share
36% 93%
Average warranty
29 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Solarspace

SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Xuzhou, China
Annual capacity
60+ GW/year
Employees
6000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Solarspace
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+555 82
Max Power 735 W+25 W 710 W
Avg Power 523 W 539 W+17 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.64 pp 23.16%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+0.14 pp 22.04%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -0.299%/°C+0.005
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 76 (93%)+56 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs 29.6 yrs+0.9 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Solarspace offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Solarspace cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (70%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Solarspace are both Chinese Tier 1 solar module manufacturers, but they occupy markedly different positions in the global market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is the undisputed global market leader, with a production capacity of 130 GW and over 33,800 employees. In the first half of 2025, JinkoSolar shipped approximately 41 GW of modules, securing the top spot worldwide. The company holds roughly 13% of the global module market and has surpassed 300 GW of cumulative installations. Solarspace, founded in 2011, is a mid-sized but growing manufacturer with a capacity exceeding 60 GW and a workforce of over 6,000. It maintains Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable status and has been expanding its overseas presence, including participation in a notable 6.2 GW batch of international orders alongside Jinko and Arctech in late 2025. Jinko's portfolio spans 545 module models versus Solarspace's 82, reflecting the gap in scale and geographic reach.

Technologically, the two manufacturers take different approaches. Jinko Solar leads with its TOPCon cell technology - featured in about 39% of its portfolio - achieving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a world-record TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.79% verified in independent testing. Only around 32% of Jinko's lineup is bifacial, making many of its products well suited to residential rooftop installations where rear-side gain is limited. Solarspace, by contrast, has built its portfolio almost entirely around bifacial modules - 92.7% of its lineup - combined with N-type cell technology covering nearly 70% of its range. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C edges out Jinko's -0.308%/°C, a modest but measurable advantage in warm climates. Solarspace also offers a longer average product warranty at 29.6 years versus Jinko's 28.5 years, and its average module power of 539 Wp slightly exceeds Jinko's 511 Wp average.

For international buyers, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice for residential, commercial C&I, and large utility-scale projects where brand recognition, financing bankability, and global after-sales support are priorities. Solarspace presents a compelling alternative for ground-mount utility-scale projects where bifacial gain over high-albedo surfaces can be fully captured, and where buyers are comfortable working with a newer but financially credible brand offering competitive specifications at potentially attractive price points.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Solarspace
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Solarspace
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Solarspace
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers · See 5 Solarspace offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.