Jinko Solar vs SMA Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
SMA Solar Technology AG is a leading German manufacturer of solar inverters for photovoltaic systems, serving residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications worldwide. Founded in 1981, the company is the largest solar technology company in Europe by revenue and operates in over 190 countries. SMA focuses...
- Founded
- 1981
- Headquarters
- Niestetal, Germany
- Employees
- 3000-5000
- Listed
- ETR: S92
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jinko Solar and SMA Solar are both established players in the photovoltaic industry, but they occupy entirely different segments - making a direct head-to-head comparison inherently asymmetric. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a declared production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,000 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status and offers a portfolio of 545 modules with a peak output of 735 Wp and a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%. SMA Solar, by contrast, is a German inverter and energy management systems manufacturer founded in 1981 and listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (ETR). Critically, SMA does not manufacture solar panels - its product lines cover string and central inverters, battery storage systems, EV charging solutions, and grid management platforms. The two companies therefore serve complementary, not competing, roles in a PV system.
Jinko Solar's core strength lies in its TOPCon (N-type) cell technology, which accounts for roughly 39% of its current portfolio and has yielded a world-record laboratory cell efficiency of 27.79% as of late 2025, independently verified by Germany's ISFH institute. Annual degradation for N-type modules is rated at 0.4%, and the average product warranty across the portfolio stands at approximately 28.5 years - figures that make Jinko well-suited for residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications where long-term yield certainty is paramount. Bifacial modules represent close to 32% of the offering, expanding suitability for ground-mount systems with reflective surfaces. SMA Solar, ranked third globally among inverter manufacturers by Wood Mackenzie in 2025 and the highest-placed non-Chinese supplier in that ranking, is the preferred inverter choice for European residential and large-scale installations where software integration, grid compliance, and after-sales support are priorities.
For an international buyer, the decision between these two companies is not a panel-versus-panel trade-off but a module-versus-inverter one. Jinko Solar is a strong candidate for the PV module supply in any system size, backed by competitive pricing, a broad TOPCon portfolio, and proven bankability. SMA Solar remains a reference-grade inverter supplier in Europe, though its 2025 financial results showed losses exceeding 75 million USD alongside an ongoing restructuring program - a factor worth weighing when assessing long-term service and warranty support commitments.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.