Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs RMCIP - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
RMCIP
Russia Founded 1963
Read the RMCIP review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 1 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 1
Highest power
735 Wp 200 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 12.4%
Average efficiency
22.2% 12.4%
Bifacial share
36% 0%
Average warranty
29 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
RMCIP

Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC (RMCIP) is a Russian industrial manufacturer established in 1963, primarily known as the only producer of sealed magnetically operated contacts (reed switches) in Russia and CIS countries. The company also manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic solar modules (RZMP...

Founded
1963
Headquarters
Ryazan, Russia
Annual capacity
<0.1 GW/year
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar RMCIP
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+636 1
Max Power 735 W+535 W 200 W
Avg Power 523 W+323 W 200 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+12.40 pp 12.40%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+9.78 pp 12.40%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.096 -0.400%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%)+36 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+3.7 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

RMCIP cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and RMCIP represent two entirely different categories of solar PV manufacturer. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in Shanghai, China, is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and holds Tier 1 bankable status - a critical qualification for project financing. With a production capacity of 130 GW per year and a workforce of over 33,800 employees, it consistently ranks among the top one or two module suppliers globally by shipment volume, having shipped approximately 93 GW in 2024 alone. RMCIP - the Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant - is a Russian state-linked enterprise founded in 1963 whose primary business is the manufacture of reed switches and precision electronic components. Its solar panel activity is marginal, with a production capacity below 0.1 GW, no Tier 1 bankability certification, and a portfolio of a single commercially documented module rated at 200 Wp. No independent performance reviews or PVEL scorecards are available for RMCIP products.

Jinko Solar's technology portfolio spans 545 panel models with a maximum output of 735 Wp and an average module efficiency of 22.0%. Its flagship N-type TOPCon technology - representing nearly 40% of its lineup - has achieved world-record lab cell efficiency of 27.79% and delivers a temperature coefficient of -0.31%/°C, making it well-suited for both residential rooftop installations and large-scale utility ground-mount projects. The Tiger Neo 3.0 series has recently secured close to 150 MW in European distributed PV orders, including supply agreements in Poland. Jinko has held Top Performer status in PVEL module reliability scorecards for 11 consecutive years. RMCIP's single documented panel uses an unknown cell technology, carries a temperature coefficient of -0.40%/°C, offers no bifacial option, and comes with a 25-year warranty that lacks the financial backing of a Tier 1 manufacturer.

For international buyers - whether sourcing for residential rooftop, commercial C&I, or utility-scale projects - Jinko Solar is the clear choice between these two: it offers a broad, high-efficiency portfolio, verified manufacturing consistency, bankable status for project finance, and an established European distribution network. RMCIP has no practical competitive positioning outside of a very narrow domestic Russian context and should not be considered a viable alternative for projects requiring long-term performance guarantees or third-party financial due diligence.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar RMCIP
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO RMCIP
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar RMCIP
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.