Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs MWG - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
MWG
Poland Founded 2005
Read the MWG review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 2 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 2
Highest power
735 Wp 400 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 20.1%
Average efficiency
22.2% 19.7%
Bifacial share
36% 0%
Average warranty
29 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
MWG

MW Power is a Polish brand operating under MPL Group, offering a range of technology products including photovoltaic panels sold under the MW Green Power (MWG) brand. Their solar modules are small-wattage units (10W–100W) made from monocrystalline silicon, primarily intended for autonomous and off-grid energy systems...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Zabrze, Poland
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar MWG
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+635 2
Max Power 735 W+335 W 400 W
Avg Power 523 W+153 W 370 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+4.68 pp 20.12%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+2.46 pp 19.72%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.086 -0.390%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%)+36 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+3.7 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

MWG cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and MWG represent vastly different scales of operation in the solar PV industry. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). It holds Tier 1 bankable status and employs over 33,800 people globally, with a module production capacity of 130 GW per year - making it the world's leading solar module manufacturer by shipment volume. In the first three quarters of 2025, the company shipped 61.9 GW of modules and became the first manufacturer to cumulatively deliver over 370 GW worldwide. MWG, by contrast, is a Polish company founded in 2005 that does not hold Tier 1 bankable status and has no publicly available panel performance data, suggesting it operates at a much smaller, likely regional, scale.

Jinko Solar's product portfolio spans 545 panel models, with maximum module power reaching 735 Wp and peak efficiency of 24.8%, driven primarily by its N-type TOPCon cell technology. The Tiger Neo series features low temperature coefficients (averaging -0.308% per degree Celsius), high bifaciality across a significant share of the range, and average product warranties exceeding 28 years. This breadth makes Jinko suitable for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount systems equally well. Jinko has also been a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years, reinforcing manufacturing consistency. MWG, with no panel data available in industry databases and no Tier 1 rating, appears to serve a narrower local or regional niche, but the absence of verifiable technical specifications makes direct product comparison impossible.

For international buyers or Polish installers evaluating these two brands, Jinko Solar offers a well-documented, bankable product with global service infrastructure and a proven track record at every system scale. MWG's suitability cannot be objectively assessed without current technical datasheets and independent performance validation - buyers should request verified product documentation directly from the manufacturer before committing to a project.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar MWG
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO MWG
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar MWG
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers · See 2 MWG offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.