Jinko Solar vs Kyocera - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 8 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to...
- Founded
- 1959
- Headquarters
- Kyoto, Japan
- Employees
- 77,136
- Listed
- TYO: 6971
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jinko Solar and Kyocera represent fundamentally different positions in the global solar PV market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, has grown into the world's largest solar panel manufacturer, with a production capacity of 130 GW and confirmed Tier 1 bankable status that streamlines project financing worldwide. Listed on the NYSE and employing over 33,800 people, the company maintains an extensive portfolio of 545 modules, with maximum efficiency reaching 24.8% and an average of 22%, anchored by N-type TOPCon cell technology. Kyocera, by contrast, is a Japanese industrial conglomerate founded in 1959 for which solar is one segment among many - its current catalog comprises only 8 modules, average efficiency stands at 18.21%, no bifacial products are offered, and the company lacks Tier 1 bankable status. Kyocera ceased North American solar sales operations in 2016, significantly limiting its geographic reach in Western markets.
Jinko Solar's portfolio breadth is a key competitive advantage: TOPCon cells account for nearly 40% of its lineup, 31.9% of modules are bifacial, the average temperature coefficient is a favorable -0.31%/°C, and the maximum output reaches 735 Wp. This versatility makes Jinko equally well suited to residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications. The company has also earned PVEL Top Performer recognition for eleven consecutive years (2015-2025), underscoring manufacturing consistency at scale. Kyocera's primary strength lies in its documented long-term durability - internal data from its Sakura facility records only 17.2% total degradation after more than 36 years of operation - but its narrow eight-panel catalog, absence of bifacial technology, and weaker temperature coefficient of -0.46%/°C confine it to niche use cases such as small off-grid systems or specialty industrial installations where proven longevity matters more than peak performance.
For international buyers choosing between the two for new grid-tied projects, Jinko Solar is the clear selection at any scale, offering modern technology, competitive pricing, strong bankability for project finance, and a product range that covers everything from residential to large ground-mount. Kyocera retains appeal for buyers who place exceptional longevity and brand heritage above leading-edge efficiency, particularly in markets where the company remains active, but its limited current portfolio and older technology stack make it difficult to recommend as a primary module supplier for projects commissioned in 2025.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.