Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Jolywood - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Jolywood
China Founded 2008 Tier 1
Read the Jolywood review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 128 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 128
Highest power
735 Wp 715 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.6%
Average efficiency
22.2% 22.5%
Bifacial share
36% 86%
Average warranty
29 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Jolywood
Founded
2008
Headquarters
Taizhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Jolywood
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+509 128
Max Power 735 W+20 W 715 W
Avg Power 523 W 554 W+31 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.20 pp 23.60%
Avg Efficiency 22.18% 22.54%+0.37 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -0.284%/°C+0.020
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 110 (86%)+50 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs 30.0 yrs+1.3 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Jolywood cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (95%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), is one of the largest solar panel manufacturers in the world, with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. Its global reach and long track record - including eleven consecutive years of Top Performer recognition from PVEL (2015-2025) - make it a dominant Tier 1 name across all major markets. Jolywood, founded in 2008 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), is a more focused, niche player that was among the pioneers of commercial N-type TOPCon cell production. While smaller in scale and offering a portfolio of 128 models compared to Jinko's 545, Jolywood has built a reputation as a technology-forward manufacturer and earned its own Top Performer recognition from Kiwa PVEL in 2025.

Jolywood's portfolio is heavily concentrated on TOPCon technology (95.3% of its lineup) and bifacial modules (85.9%), resulting in a higher average module power of 553.6 Wp and a better average temperature coefficient of -0.284%/°C compared to Jinko's -0.308%/°C. These characteristics make Jolywood a strong fit for ground-mounted utility-scale projects and flat-roof commercial installations, where bifacial energy gain and low thermal losses directly drive annual yield. Its 30-year performance warranty also exceeds Jinko's portfolio average of 28.5 years. Jinko Solar, by contrast, offers a far broader range covering both mono-facial and bifacial applications, with a maximum module power of 735 Wp and a leading maximum efficiency of 24.8% in its Tiger Neo series. This versatility makes Jinko well-suited to residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and large-scale utility deployments - particularly where brand recognition, installer support networks, and bankability are decisive criteria.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely reflects project type and risk profile. Jinko Solar's scale, extensive distribution network, and long reliability record make it a lower-risk choice for diverse and mixed portfolios. Jolywood is the stronger option for buyers specifically targeting high-efficiency bifacial ground-mount systems, where its deep TOPCon specialization, superior temperature coefficient, and longer warranty can deliver measurable performance advantages over the system lifetime.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-08

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jolywood
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jolywood
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Jolywood
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 170 Jinko Solar offers · See 45 Jolywood offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.