Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Sunket New Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Sunket New Energy
China Founded 2007
Read the Sunket New Energy review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 55 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Sunket New Energy leans bifacial (78% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 55
Highest power
740 Wp 700 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.0%
Average efficiency
21.1% 21.0%
Bifacial share
47% 78%
Average warranty
28 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Sunket New Energy

Wuxi Sunket New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the design, production, and sales of solar cells, photovoltaic modules, lithium batteries, and solar systems. The company is committed to becoming a diversified, large-scale, international professional solar green energy supplier, providing one-stop services...

Founded
2007
Headquarters
Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China
Annual capacity
3 GW/year
Employees
201-500
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Sunket New Energy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+449 55
Max Power 740 W+40 W 700 W
Avg Power 456 W 465 W+8 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.76 pp 23.04%
Avg Efficiency 21.13%+0.09 pp 21.05%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C -0.302%/°C+0.020
Bifacial Share 238 (47%) 43 (78%)+31 pp
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs 28.9 yrs+1.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Sunket New Energy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (53%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and Sunket New Energy are both Chinese solar module manufacturers, but they occupy very different tiers of the global industry. JA Solar was founded in 2005, is publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and employs over 37,000 people across a manufacturing footprint exceeding 100 GW of annual capacity - placing it consistently among the top two module suppliers worldwide. It holds Tier 1 bankable status and an AAA rating in PV ModuleTech's bankability rankings, and earned PVEL Top Performer recognition for the tenth consecutive year in 2025. Sunket New Energy, founded in 2007 and headquartered in Wuxi, operates at a fundamentally different scale: 201-500 employees, approximately 3 GW of declared production capacity, and a portfolio of 55 modules compared to JA Solar's 524. Sunket does not appear in the major Tier 1 bankability lists reviewed during research, which is a meaningful distinction for project finance purposes.

On the technology side, the two manufacturers make different strategic bets. JA Solar's portfolio is still led by PERC technology at 52.1% of its lineup, with a maximum module output of 740 Wp and average panel efficiency of 20.87%. Sunket, by contrast, has pivoted more aggressively toward TOPCon, which accounts for 52.7% of its portfolio, and achieves a notably higher bifacial share at 78.2% versus 44.3% for JA Solar. Sunket's average efficiency of 21.05% is marginally higher, and its average temperature coefficient of -0.301%/°C compares favorably to JA Solar's -0.323%/°C - an advantage in thermally demanding installations. For utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial rooftops, or any bankable-financed scheme, JA Solar's global supply chain, verified reliability data, and financial standing make it the standard choice. Sunket's TOPCon-heavy, high-bifacial portfolio positions it as a viable option for installers targeting strong rear-side energy yield gains - such as ground-mount systems with reflective surfaces - at potentially lower cost.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges primarily on risk tolerance and project type. JA Solar is the lower-risk selection for large-scale or financed projects where bankability, warranty longevity, and brand recognition matter to lenders and asset managers. Sunket can offer competitive specifications for buyers comfortable conducting their own due diligence on a smaller manufacturer, particularly for projects where a high bifacial ratio and favorable temperature coefficient are priorities and where project finance requirements are less stringent.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Sunket New Energy
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Sunket New Energy
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Sunket New Energy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 333 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.