Skip to main content

Hyundai vs Thornova - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
VS
Thornova
China Founded 2016 Tier 1
Read the Thornova review
At a glance

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
65 0
Highest power
640 Wp 0 Wp
Best efficiency
23.4% -
Average efficiency
21.5% -
Bifacial share
66% 0%
Average warranty
27 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Thornova

Thornova Solar (formerly Sunova Solar) is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, specializing in high-efficiency TOPCon and PERC bifacial solar modules. The company operates manufacturing facilities in China and Indonesia with a combined module capacity of 6.5 GW and cell capacity...

Founded
2016
Headquarters
Wuxi, China
Annual capacity
5-10 GW/year
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hyundai Thornova
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 65+65 0
Max Power 640 W+640 W 0 W
Avg Power 442 W+442 W 0 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.40% -
Avg Efficiency 21.49% -
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.300%/°C -
Bifacial Share 43 (66%)+66 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.4 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)

Thornova cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
Thornova all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hyundai Energy Solutions - operating under the HD Hyundai corporate umbrella and headquartered in South Korea - has been making solar modules since the early 2000s and holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status, placing it among the manufacturers that major lenders will finance without additional scrutiny. Its annual production capacity stands at roughly 1.4 GW, a more modest footprint compared to the largest Chinese producers. Thornova Solar, originally launched in the United States in 2022 under the Sunova Solar parent brand, earned Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2023 and reported cumulative global shipments of 7.1 GW by end of 2024, with an annual production capacity around 6.5 GW. The brand and its intellectual property were subsequently acquired by ICE EYE in 2025, introducing some corporate continuity uncertainty. On institutional scale and depth of manufacturing history, Hyundai carries the stronger footprint.

Both brands have transitioned to N-type TOPCon cell technology in their mainstream lines. HD Hyundai has confirmed mass production of N-type TOPCon cells from its South Korean facility, with module outputs reaching 640 W and above for utility and commercial applications, and a 30-year performance warranty on flagship lines. Thornova's Tangra M PRO series - rated in the 575-605 W range - earned Kiwa PVEL Top Performer recognition across all seven reliability test categories in 2025 and passed enhanced hail stress testing, which appeals to buyers in high-risk weather regions. Hyundai has historically targeted residential and mid-scale commercial rooftops; Thornova's high-wattage bifacial lineup skews toward commercial and utility-scale ground-mount installations.

For a typical residential or commercial buyer in 2025, Hyundai is the lower-risk default choice given its longer track record, in-house UL- and VDE-accredited testing laboratory, and the stability of its corporate parent. Thornova is a credible alternative - especially for price-sensitive utility-scale projects where its Tier 1 bankability and PVEL recognition carry weight - but buyers should monitor the post-acquisition brand direction carefully before committing to large volumes.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-08

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hyundai A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Thornova
Manufacturers
Hyundai AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Thornova
Manufacturers
Hyundai AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Thornova
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 42 Hyundai offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.