Hyundai vs TCL - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...
- Founded
- 2004
- Headquarters
- Seongnam-si, South Korea
- Annual capacity
- 1.35 GW/year
- Employees
- 206
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+
Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)
The flagships
Written summary
Hyundai Energy Solutions, operating under the HD Hyundai conglomerate and headquartered in South Korea, has manufactured solar panels since the early 2000s and holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status. The company has roughly 1.4 GW of annual module production capacity, a modest figure by Chinese-industry standards but consistent with a premium-positioned, mid-scale manufacturer. TCL Solar, the photovoltaic arm of China-based TCL Technology Group, entered module manufacturing more recently but has grown rapidly; its affiliated wafer entity TCL Zhonghuan targets silicon wafer output measured in the hundreds of gigawatts annually, and TCL Solar's own module lines run into the tens of gigawatts. TCL Solar also holds BNEF Tier 1 status and retained that designation into Q1 2026, signaling solid bankability. On sheer institutional scale and upstream integration, TCL carries the larger industrial footprint.
Hyundai's current catalogue centers on N-type TOPCon technology across both a residential line - compact all-black 108-cell modules in the 430-440 W range - and a commercial-to-utility line reaching 640 W per module, with confirmed efficiencies between roughly 22.3% and 22.9%. Hyundai earned a top-performer designation in PVEL's 2025 PQP test and backs its panels with a 25-year product warranty and 30-year performance warranty. TCL Solar has taken a more diversified technology approach, offering shingled TOPCon modules under the T5 Pro brand (450-475 W for rooftops, 640-670 W for ground mounts reaching up to 23.8% efficiency), as well as back-contact (BC) modules that demonstrated 25.2% efficiency at SNEC 2025 and hit 680 W output - figures that place TCL among the efficiency frontrunners globally.
For a typical residential or small commercial buyer in 2025, Hyundai represents a well-tested, bankable option with a clear warranty commitment and a long institutional history - a low-risk choice. TCL Solar offers a compelling case for buyers who prioritize peak efficiency or utility-scale economics, particularly where its BC or shingled TOPCon modules can be sourced at competitive prices. Neither brand is a poor choice given both carry BNEF Tier 1 status, but Hyundai suits conservative buyers while TCL appeals to those chasing the efficiency ceiling.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-26
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 42 Hyundai offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.