Hyundai vs Risen - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Risen has the broader catalog (153 vs 65 models). Risen leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...
- Founded
- 2004
- Headquarters
- Seongnam-si, South Korea
- Annual capacity
- 1.35 GW/year
- Employees
- 206
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
- Founded
- 1986
- Headquarters
- Ninghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 300118
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Risen skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+
Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (39%)
The flagships
Written summary
Hyundai Energy Solutions and Risen Energy are both Tier 1 bankable manufacturers, but their institutional footprints differ markedly. Hyundai Energy Solutions, a South Korean company established in 2004 and listed on the Korea Stock Exchange, operates at a production capacity of roughly 1.35 GW with a staff of around 206 - a boutique scale by contemporary solar standards. Risen Energy, founded in 1986 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), is a substantially larger Chinese manufacturer that has scaled to approximately 40 GW of annual module production capacity, placing it among the top-tier global suppliers. Both carry Tier 1 bankability status, but Risen's scale and longer operating history give it the stronger institutional footprint for large-volume project financing and supply-chain resilience.
The two portfolios serve different ends of the market. Hyundai's 65-panel lineup is oriented toward premium residential and small commercial applications, averaging 442 Wp per module and topping out at 640 Wp, with average panel efficiency of 21.5% and a best-in-range of 23.4% powered predominantly by HJT cell technology (roughly 38% of the portfolio). About 66% of its modules are bifacial, warranties average 27.4 years, and the temperature coefficient for Pmax sits at -0.30%/°C. Risen's 153-panel catalog is pitched at higher wattage tiers, averaging 547 Wp and peaking at 745 Wp, with average efficiency of 21.8% and a portfolio high of 24.0% driven by TOPCon cells (around 39% of the range). An impressive 82% of Risen's lineup is bifacial, warranties average a longer 29.1 years, and its temperature coefficient is a marginally better -0.29%/°C. Hyundai's focused SKU count suits buyers prioritizing HJT quality in a residential context; Risen's broad, high-wattage bifacial catalog is better matched to utility-scale ground mounts and large commercial rooftops.
For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice pivots on scale and use case. Risen is the more practical default for utility and large commercial developers who need high-wattage bifacial modules at competitive volume pricing, backed by a deep product catalog. Hyundai remains a credible and well-tested option for premium residential or low-footprint commercial installations where HJT efficiency, strong independent test results, and a tighter product focus carry real weight.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 41 Hyundai offers · See 22 Risen offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.