Skip to main content

Hyundai vs Risen - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
VS
Risen
China Founded 1986 Tier 1
Read the Risen review
At a glance

Risen has the broader catalog (153 vs 65 models). Risen leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
65 153
Highest power
640 Wp 745 Wp
Best efficiency
23.4% 24.0%
Average efficiency
21.5% 21.8%
Bifacial share
66% 82%
Average warranty
27 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Risen
Founded
1986
Headquarters
Ninghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hyundai Risen
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 65 153+88
Max Power 640 W 745 W+105 W
Avg Power 442 W 547 W+105 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.40% 24.00%+0.60 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.49% 21.82%+0.33 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.300%/°C -0.291%/°C+0.009
Bifacial Share 43 (66%) 125 (82%)+16 pp
Avg Warranty 27.4 yrs 29.1 yrs+1.7 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Risen skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)

Risen cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (39%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hyundai Energy Solutions and Risen Energy are both Tier 1 bankable manufacturers, but their institutional footprints differ markedly. Hyundai Energy Solutions, a South Korean company established in 2004 and listed on the Korea Stock Exchange, operates at a production capacity of roughly 1.35 GW with a staff of around 206 - a boutique scale by contemporary solar standards. Risen Energy, founded in 1986 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), is a substantially larger Chinese manufacturer that has scaled to approximately 40 GW of annual module production capacity, placing it among the top-tier global suppliers. Both carry Tier 1 bankability status, but Risen's scale and longer operating history give it the stronger institutional footprint for large-volume project financing and supply-chain resilience.

The two portfolios serve different ends of the market. Hyundai's 65-panel lineup is oriented toward premium residential and small commercial applications, averaging 442 Wp per module and topping out at 640 Wp, with average panel efficiency of 21.5% and a best-in-range of 23.4% powered predominantly by HJT cell technology (roughly 38% of the portfolio). About 66% of its modules are bifacial, warranties average 27.4 years, and the temperature coefficient for Pmax sits at -0.30%/°C. Risen's 153-panel catalog is pitched at higher wattage tiers, averaging 547 Wp and peaking at 745 Wp, with average efficiency of 21.8% and a portfolio high of 24.0% driven by TOPCon cells (around 39% of the range). An impressive 82% of Risen's lineup is bifacial, warranties average a longer 29.1 years, and its temperature coefficient is a marginally better -0.29%/°C. Hyundai's focused SKU count suits buyers prioritizing HJT quality in a residential context; Risen's broad, high-wattage bifacial catalog is better matched to utility-scale ground mounts and large commercial rooftops.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice pivots on scale and use case. Risen is the more practical default for utility and large commercial developers who need high-wattage bifacial modules at competitive volume pricing, backed by a deep product catalog. Hyundai remains a credible and well-tested option for premium residential or low-footprint commercial installations where HJT efficiency, strong independent test results, and a tighter product focus carry real weight.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hyundai A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Risen
Manufacturers
Hyundai AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Risen
Manufacturers
Hyundai AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Risen
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 41 Hyundai offers · See 22 Risen offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.