Skip to main content

GoodWe vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

GoodWe
China Founded 2010 Tier 1
Read the GoodWe review
VS
Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 637
Highest power
0 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
- 24.8%
Average efficiency
- 22.2%
Bifacial share
0% 36%
Average warranty
- 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
GoodWe

GoodWe is a world-leading solar inverter and smart energy solution provider headquartered in Suzhou, China. The company manufactures a broad range of inverters from 0.7 kW to 350 kW for residential, commercial, industrial, and utility-scale applications, as well as battery storage systems. Listed on the Shanghai Stock...

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Employees
5000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric GoodWe Jinko Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 637+637
Max Power 0 W 735 W+735 W
Avg Power 0 W 523 W+523 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 24.80%
Avg Efficiency - 22.18%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.304%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 231 (36%)+36 pp
Avg Warranty - 28.7 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

GoodWe cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
GoodWe all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

GoodWe and Jinko Solar are two well-established Chinese manufacturers in the photovoltaic industry, but they occupy fundamentally different product segments, which is the key context for any comparison. GoodWe, founded in 2010 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, is exclusively an inverter and energy storage system manufacturer - it produces no solar panels. With over 5,000 employees, a manufacturing capacity of 35 GW for inverters, and more than 100 GW of cumulative installed capacity worldwide, GoodWe ranks among the top 5 global PV inverter vendors and holds the position of the world's leading residential hybrid inverter supplier according to Wood Mackenzie. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of 33,830 employees. Both companies carry Tier 1 bankable status, confirming their financial and operational credibility with project lenders.

GoodWe's product strength lies in its broad range of string inverters, hybrid inverters, and battery storage solutions suited to residential rooftop installs and commercial C&I projects alike. Its competitive price-to-performance ratio and wide service network make it a frequent choice for installers across Europe. Jinko Solar, by contrast, competes on module technology and scale - its catalog of 545 panels reaches a maximum output of 735 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 24.8%, with an average panel efficiency of approximately 22.0%. TOPCon is the leading cell technology in its portfolio, accounting for around 39.4% of offerings, while bifacial modules represent roughly 31.9% of the range. The average product warranty across its lineup stands at nearly 28.5 years, underpinning suitability for utility-scale ground-mount and long-term commercial C&I projects where bankability and degradation rates matter most.

For international buyers, GoodWe and Jinko Solar are in practice complementary rather than competing choices - GoodWe for the inverter and storage layer, Jinko for the module layer. Buyers selecting a module supplier will find Jinko's deep TOPCon portfolio, strong bifacial offering, and NYSE-listed transparency compelling for both residential and large-scale procurement. Those selecting inverter and storage solutions will find GoodWe's hybrid ecosystem, competitive pricing, and Tier 1 bankability well-suited to markets where residential storage adoption is growing rapidly.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
GoodWe A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
GoodWe AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
GoodWe AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Jinko Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.