Skip to main content

Gokin vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Gokin
Headquarters not published
Read the Gokin review
VS
AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 44 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
44 144
Highest power
780 Wp 805 Wp
Best efficiency
24.5% 25.2%
Average efficiency
23.6% 23.7%
Bifacial share
11% 24%
Average warranty
30 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Gokin AIKO
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 44 144+100
Max Power 780 W 805 W+25 W
Avg Power 517 W 581 W+65 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.50% 25.20%+0.70 pp
Avg Efficiency 23.58% 23.65%+0.07 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.260%/°C+0.011 -0.271%/°C
Bifacial Share 5 (11%) 35 (24%)+13 pp
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+0.5 yr 29.5 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

Gokin cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (100%)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Gokin Solar and AIKO Solar are both Chinese manufacturers staking their reputations on Back Contact (BC) cell technology, but they occupy meaningfully different positions in the industry. AIKO was founded in 2009, is headquartered in China, and is publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE). It achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status in Q3 2024 and has claimed production of over 130 GW of solar cells through 2024, with an additional 11 GW of ABC-dedicated module capacity being expanded. Gokin Solar is a newer entrant, founded in 2019 and based in Zhuhai, China. It is privately held, having raised roughly $746 million in funding, and reached a milestone of 3 million BC modules shipped as of early 2026 - but it does not yet appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list. For any project requiring non-recourse finance from commercial banks, AIKO's Tier 1 status gives it a decisive institutional advantage.

On paper, the two lineups are remarkably close in raw performance, which makes the non-technical differences matter more. AIKO's 144-panel portfolio averages 581 Wp and 23.65% efficiency, with a peak of 805 Wp and 25.2% - figures that reflect its leading ABC (All Back Contact) cells and place it squarely in the premium residential and utility segment. About 24.3% of its panels are bifacial, making roughly one-in-four modules suitable for ground-mount installations where rear-side gain is valuable. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.27%/°C is competitive. Gokin's 44-panel portfolio averages 517 Wp and 23.58% efficiency, peaking at 780 Wp and 24.5%, with Back Contact cells making up an even larger share of the range at 79.6%. Only 11.4% of Gokin's panels are bifacial, which narrows its utility-scale appeal. Gokin holds a slight edge on temperature coefficient (-0.26%/°C) and warranty length (30 years average versus AIKO's 29.5 years), small but real differences for long-horizon asset owners.

For a typical buyer in 2025-2026, AIKO is the safer default. Its Tier 1 bankability removes a key barrier for project-financed or commercial-scale installations, its product catalog is broader, and its peak efficiency and power figures are the highest in this comparison. Gokin is a credible option for buyers who can accept a non-Tier-1 supplier - its BC technology is independently certified, its warranty stance is slightly stronger, and its lower temperature coefficient is a real benefit in hot climates - but it is still building the track record that lenders require.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-11

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Gokin A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
Gokin AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME AIKO
Manufacturers
Gokin ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AIKO
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 7 Gokin offers · See 179 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.