Gamko New Energy vs Vikram Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Gamko New Energy has the broader catalog (255 vs 213 models). Vikram Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Gamko New Energy is a professional solar module manufacturer with a 10-year experience in production and quality control since 2008. They also provide technical services for solar power plants, including design, installation, and maintenance. In 2018, their production capacity reached 2GW.
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Nantong, Jiangsu, China
- Annual capacity
- 1.2 GW/year
- Employees
- 201-300
Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...
- Founded
- 2005
- Headquarters
- Kolkata, India
- Annual capacity
- 9.5 GW/year
- Employees
- 1,895
- Listed
- NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Gamko New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+
Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (45% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (57%)
Dominant cell tech: PERC (71%)
The flagships
Written summary
Gamko New Energy is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Nantong, Jiangsu Province, established around 2017. The company reports an annual production capacity of approximately 1.2 GW and holds a range of international certifications including IEC 61215, IEC 61730, TUV, CE, and ISO 9001. No Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability designation has surfaced for Gamko in available industry sources, which places it in the broader category of mid-tier Chinese exporters rather than among the most institutionally recognised manufacturers. Vikram Solar, by contrast, is an Indian manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Kolkata, with production facilities in West Bengal and, since late 2025, a fully commissioned 5 GW automated TOPCon module plant in Vallam, Tamil Nadu. Total nameplate capacity has reached over 9.5 GW, and Vikram has maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for at least eight consecutive quarters through 2025 - the only Indian manufacturer to hold this designation - while surpassing 10 GW in cumulative global deployments as of early 2026. On institutional footprint and bankability, Vikram Solar leads by a clear margin.
Gamko's catalogued portfolio spans a wide wattage range suited primarily to residential rooftop and small commercial applications, with datasheets showing both PERC and TOPCon cell lines, including bifacial variants, at price points oriented toward export markets. Vikram Solar's current product offering centres on TOPCon technology across utility-scale ground-mount, commercial and industrial (C&I), and residential segments. The recently launched Hypersol Pro series and a manufacturing infrastructure supporting M10, G12, and G12R wafer formats reflect a mature, high-throughput operation. The Vallam facility is also engineered for future HJT upgrades, signalling a credible technology roadmap beyond the current generation.
For most international buyers - particularly those financing utility or C&I projects through development banks or institutional lenders - Vikram Solar is the stronger default choice, owing to its verified Tier 1 standing, documented manufacturing scale, and presence across 39 countries. Gamko New Energy may be worth considering for price-sensitive residential or small-scale commercial projects where lender bankability requirements are less stringent, but buyers should conduct independent due diligence given the limited third-party review coverage available for this brand.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.