EGing PV vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 131 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2003
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600537
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (76%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
The flagships
Written summary
EGing PV, founded in 2003 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), is one of the older dedicated PV module manufacturers in China, with a focused portfolio of 131 panels. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, has grown into the world's top solar module supplier by shipment volume, holding approximately 13% global market share and ranking first in global module deliveries in H1 2025. Both carry Tier 1 bankable status, but the gap in scale is substantial: Jinko Solar employs over 33,000 people, declares a production capacity of 130 GW, and maintains a catalog of 545 panels, giving it considerably greater supply chain depth and international financial visibility compared to EGing PV's more regional footprint. Jinko's NYSE listing also tends to ease due-diligence requirements for project lenders in Western markets.
From a technology perspective, EGing PV's lineup is centered on PERC cell technology (approximately 75% of its portfolio), with a maximum module efficiency of 22.45% and a portfolio average of 20.9%. Its bifaciality share of roughly 39% is a positive trait for its market segment. Jinko Solar has made a decisive shift toward N-type TOPCon, which accounts for around 39% of its much larger catalog, driving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a portfolio average of 22.0%. Jinko's average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C is meaningfully better than EGing's -0.336%/°C, resulting in lower power losses during high-temperature operation - a relevant factor for commercial rooftops and utility-scale ground-mount sites. Jinko's average warranty of approximately 28.5 years also exceeds EGing's roughly 26.9 years. For residential rooftop installs, EGing's PERC-based Tier 1 modules remain a cost-competitive choice. For utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects, Jinko's TOPCon portfolio, longer warranty terms, and 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer recognitions make it the more compelling option.
For international buyers weighing the two, Jinko Solar offers superior technology trajectory, broader supply availability, and stronger project finance credentials - advantages that matter most in large or institutionally funded installations. EGing PV is a credible Tier 1 choice for smaller, cost-sensitive residential or light commercial applications, though its reported financial difficulties in 2024 - including a sharp revenue decline and a significant net loss - are a material consideration when assessing the long-term reliability of its warranty backstop.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-08
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 3 EGing PV offers · See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.