Skip to main content

DAH vs MY Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

DAH
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the DAH review
VS
MY Solar
Headquarters not published
Read the MY Solar review
At a glance

MY Solar has the broader catalog (140 vs 0 models). MY Solar leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 140
Highest power
0 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
- 23.8%
Average efficiency
- 19.9%
Bifacial share
0% 39%
Average warranty
- 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
DAH
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric DAH MY Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 140+140
Max Power 0 W 740 W+740 W
Avg Power 0 W 418 W+418 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 23.82%
Avg Efficiency - 19.87%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.333%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 54 (39%)+39 pp
Avg Warranty - 27.1 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

MY Solar skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

MY Solar offers more 600W+ panels (21% of lineup)

DAH cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
MY Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: PERC (58%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

DAH is a Chinese solar module manufacturer that has repeatedly appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 PV module manufacturer list, including the Q1 2025 and Q4 2025 rankings, a status it has held since at least 2023. The company has invested heavily in n-type TOPCon capacity, with announced projects including a 10 GW vertically integrated plant in Shanxi and additional wafer and cell expansions in Anhui province, though exact current totals vary across reports and likely sit in the multi-gigawatt range per year. MY Solar, by contrast, operates under the Horay Solar corporate umbrella, founded around 2010 and based in Wuxi, China, with a Malaysia factory added in 2019 to serve the North American market; its reported annual capacity figures range from roughly 500 MW to 2.5 GW depending on the source, and no confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing for the brand turned up in available records. On institutional footprint, DAH clearly has the stronger and better-documented position, with consistent third-party Tier 1 recognition and larger-scale, publicly tracked manufacturing expansion.

In terms of product focus, DAH's lineup centers on n-type TOPCon bifacial glass-glass modules spanning residential, commercial and utility-scale use, including higher-wattage large-format panels (up to roughly 700 W+ in some utility-oriented series) and a "Full-Screen" rectangular-cell TOPCon line aimed at C&I and utility projects, alongside a smaller residential kit branded as a compact "Solar Unit." MY Solar's catalog, built on the same Horay Solar manufacturing base, also leans on monocrystalline and bifacial TOPCon modules, positioned more generically across residential and commercial rooftops, with warranty terms that vary noticeably between datasheets (some citing 15-year product warranties, others 30 years), suggesting a less standardized product strategy than DAH's.

For a typical buyer in 2025, DAH is the safer default choice for most installations, particularly anything requiring bank or lender financing, given its sustained, independently verified Tier 1 bankability status and larger, more consistently documented production scale. MY Solar may still be a reasonable option for smaller, cash-financed residential or commercial jobs where bankability is less critical, but buyers should independently verify warranty terms and request current certification and test data, since available information on the brand is thinner and less consistent than for DAH.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-11-01

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
DAH A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar MY Solar
Manufacturers
DAH AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO MY Solar
Manufacturers
DAH AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar MY Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.