Skip to main content

DAH Solar vs ZNShine - solar panel manufacturer comparison

DAH Solar
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the DAH Solar review
VS
ZNShine
China Founded 1988 Tier 1
Read the ZNShine review
At a glance

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 212 models). DAH Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.34%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
363 212
Highest power
725 Wp 670 Wp
Best efficiency
23.3% 22.8%
Average efficiency
22.1% 21.3%
Bifacial share
87% 42%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
DAH Solar

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Annual capacity
10 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
ZNShine

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...

Founded
1988
Headquarters
Suqian, China
Annual capacity
10 GW/year
Employees
1,200
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric DAH Solar ZNShine
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 363+151 212
Max Power 725 W+55 W 670 W
Avg Power 520 W 535 W+14 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.34%+0.51 pp 22.83%
Avg Efficiency 22.10%+0.76 pp 21.35%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.299%/°C+0.031 -0.329%/°C
Bifacial Share 316 (87%)+45 pp 89 (42%)
Avg Warranty 29.4 yrs+1.1 yr 28.3 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

DAH Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

DAH Solar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)

DAH Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (88%)

ZNShine cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (63%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

DAH Solar and ZNShine are both Chinese Tier 1 solar module manufacturers with identical stated production capacities of 10 GW, yet they differ considerably in age, technology focus, and global profile. DAH Solar was founded in 2009 and has grown to over 2,000 employees, establishing itself primarily in the European and Latin American markets with distribution to more than 120 countries. It has maintained its position on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list through Q1 2025. ZNShine has deeper roots, tracing its origins to 1988 and its entry into photovoltaics to 2006, with a workforce of around 1,200 employees and a listing on China's NEEQ exchange. Both manufacturers carry Tier 1 bankable status, making them viable for project finance, though DAH Solar currently holds a higher international profile and broader installer recognition.

On the technology side, DAH Solar has made a decisive pivot toward TOPCon, which accounts for 79.6% of its 363-panel catalogue. This is reflected in a maximum module power of 725 Wp, a maximum efficiency of 23.34%, and an average portfolio efficiency of 22.1%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C is notably favorable, and 87% of its panels are bifacial - making it a strong choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and high-density residential rooftop installs where every watt per square meter counts. ZNShine's portfolio still leans on PERC technology (63.2% of 212 panels), with a maximum power of 670 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 22.83%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.329%/°C is less favorable under high-heat conditions, and bifacial coverage stands at 42%. ZNShine does differentiate itself with graphene-coated glass and double-glass constructions, which add durability and self-cleaning properties suited to commercial C&I installations or large solar farms in dusty environments.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar's advantage lies in its higher efficiency ceiling, broader bifacial portfolio, and more modern cell technology - attributes that maximize energy yield in space-constrained or performance-critical projects. ZNShine offers a credible Tier 1 alternative with a long operating history and competitive pricing, and its PERC-based products may suit buyers where budget is the primary constraint and the performance premium of TOPCon does not justify the cost difference. DAH Solar's average product warranty of 29.4 years also edges out ZNShine's 28.3 years, adding a marginal long-term assurance advantage.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
DAH Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar ZNShine
Manufacturers
DAH Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO ZNShine
Manufacturers
DAH Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar ZNShine
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 11 DAH Solar offers · See 12 ZNShine offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.