Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
VS
The verdict
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.040 %/°C better in heat. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.040 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
23.02 %
23.50 %
0.48 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
48.10 V
51.40 V
3.30 V apart
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
715 Wp
730 Wp
15 W more power
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Cell count
66
132
66 cells apart
Short-circuit current
18.64 A
17.76 A
0.88 A apart
Voltage at max power
40.60 V
43.00 V
2.40 V apart
Current at max power
17.63 A
16.98 A
0.65 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
23,990 kWh
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
24,569 kWh
Lifetime gap
579 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
683 W
702 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
651 W
673 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
618 W
645 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
730 Wp
+15 W for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Module efficiency
23.02 %
23.50 %
+0.48 pp for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
+4.8 Wp/m² for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Open-circuit voltage
48.10 V
51.40 V
3.30 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.60 V
43.00 V
2.40 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.64 A
17.76 A
0.88 A apart
Current at max power
17.63 A
16.98 A
0.65 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.040 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
39.5 kg
39.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.38 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
66
132
66 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,797
vs
#716
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 1,081 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#800
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 1,218 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#511
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 5,582 places
Weight
#9,680
vs
#8,335
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 1,345 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#721
vs
#326
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 395 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.690.05
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 or Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.02%); Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 use vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

