Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
VS
The verdict
715.05 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.49 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
715.05
700.05
Difference
Module efficiency
23.02 %
22.53 %
0.49 pp more efficient
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
715 Wp
700 Wp
15 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
715.05
23,990 kWh
700.05
23,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
504 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
715.05
700.05
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
700 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
683 W
669 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
651 W
637 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
618 W
606 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
715.05
700.05
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
700 Wp
+15 W for 715.05
Module efficiency
23.02 %
22.53 %
+0.49 pp for 715.05
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
+4.8 Wp/m² for 715.05
Open-circuit voltage
48.10 V
47.60 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.60 V
40.10 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.64 A
18.43 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.63 A
17.48 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
39.5 kg
39.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
56.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
66
66
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,797
vs
#3,982
715.05 leads by 2,185 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#3,989
715.05 leads by 1,971 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,680
vs
#10,649
715.05 leads by 969 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#721
vs
#1,210
715.05 leads by 489 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.690.05
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.53%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.