Skip to main content
NEG21C.20Q-760 vs NE21 710W 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710W

Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
760 Wp 24.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710W
TSM-NE21 710W
710 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

NEG21C.20Q-760 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter NEG21C.20Q-760 NE21 710W Difference
Module efficiency 24.50 % 22.90 % 1.60 pp more efficient
Rated power 760 Wp 710 Wp 50 W more power
Power density 244.7 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² 16.1 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight 38.3 kg 32.9 kg 5.4 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 50.4 kg/kWp 46.3 kg/kWp 4.1 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count 264 132 132 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage 50.90 V 49.00 V 1.90 V apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Voltage at max power 42.90 V 40.90 V 2.00 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NEG21C.20Q-760
25,698 kWh
NE21 710W
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,876 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NEG21C.20Q-760 NE21 710W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 760 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 730 W 679 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 701 W 648 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 671 W 617 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NEG21C.20Q-760 NE21 710W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 760 Wp 710 Wp +50 W for NEG21C.20Q-760
Module efficiency 24.50 % 22.90 % +1.60 pp for NEG21C.20Q-760
Power density 244.7 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² +16.1 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-760
Open-circuit voltage 50.90 V 49.00 V 1.90 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.90 V 40.90 V 2.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.85 A 18.40 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.72 A 17.36 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-760
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 32.9 kg -5.4 kg for NE21 710W
Weight per kWp 50.4 kg/kWp 46.3 kg/kWp -4.1 kg/kWp for NE21 710W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for NEG21C.20Q-760
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-760
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 264 132 132 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#74 vs #2,359
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 2,285 places
Power density
#86 vs #2,474
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 2,388 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #2,165
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#3,780 vs #1,119
NE21 710W leads by 2,661 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,798
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#66 vs #1,297
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 1,231 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 or Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710W?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has higher module efficiency (24.50% vs 22.90%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 and Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710W?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a module efficiency of 24.50%, while Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710 W is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710W?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 and Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710W?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 and Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710W bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Trina Solar TSM-NE21 710 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.