Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
VS
The verdict
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.70 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
NEG9RC.27-435
NEG21C.20Q-760
Difference
Module efficiency
21.80 %
24.50 %
2.70 pp more efficient
Rated power
435 Wp
760 Wp
325 W more power
Power density
217.7 Wp/m²
244.7 Wp/m²
27.0 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight
21.0 kg
38.3 kg
17.3 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current
10.64 A
18.85 A
8.21 A apart
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Current at max power
9.99 A
17.72 A
7.73 A apart
Cell count
144
264
120 cells apart
Weight per kWp
48.3 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
2.1 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NEG9RC.27-435
14,595 kWh
NEG21C.20Q-760
25,698 kWh
Lifetime gap
11,103 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
NEG9RC.27-435
NEG21C.20Q-760
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
435 W
760 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
416 W
730 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
397 W
701 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
378 W
671 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
NEG9RC.27-435
NEG21C.20Q-760
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
435 Wp
760 Wp
+325 W for NEG21C.20Q-760
Module efficiency
21.80 %
24.50 %
+2.70 pp for NEG21C.20Q-760
Power density
217.7 Wp/m²
244.7 Wp/m²
+27.0 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-760
Open-circuit voltage
51.80 V
50.90 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
43.60 V
42.90 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
10.64 A
18.85 A
8.21 A apart
Current at max power
9.99 A
17.72 A
7.73 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-760
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
21.0 kg
38.3 kg
-17.3 kg for NEG9RC.27-435
Weight per kWp
48.3 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
-2.1 kg/kWp for NEG9RC.27-435
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for NEG9RC.27-435
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-760
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
264
120 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,022
vs
#74
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 6,948 places
Power density
#7,066
vs
#86
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 6,980 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#2,138
vs
#3,780
NEG9RC.27-435 leads by 1,642 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,574
vs
#66
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 9,508 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-440
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-430
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has higher module efficiency (24.50% vs 21.80%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 is 24.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 252 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

