Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
VS
The verdict
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
NEG18RC.27-515
NEG21C.20Q-760
Difference
Module efficiency
23.20 %
24.50 %
1.30 pp more efficient
Rated power
515 Wp
760 Wp
245 W more power
Power density
231.6 Wp/m²
244.7 Wp/m²
13.1 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight
23.5 kg
38.3 kg
14.8 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
50.90 V
10.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.96 A
18.85 A
2.89 A apart
Module area
2.224 m²
3.106 m²
0.883 m² apart
Weight per kWp
45.6 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
4.8 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
33.90 V
42.90 V
9.00 V apart
Current at max power
15.20 A
17.72 A
2.52 A apart
Cell count
108
264
156 cells apart
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NEG18RC.27-515
17,279 kWh
NEG21C.20Q-760
25,698 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,419 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
NEG18RC.27-515
NEG21C.20Q-760
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
515 W
760 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
493 W
730 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
470 W
701 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
448 W
671 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
NEG18RC.27-515
NEG21C.20Q-760
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
515 Wp
760 Wp
+245 W for NEG21C.20Q-760
Module efficiency
23.20 %
24.50 %
+1.30 pp for NEG21C.20Q-760
Power density
231.6 Wp/m²
244.7 Wp/m²
+13.1 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-760
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
50.90 V
10.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.90 V
42.90 V
9.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.96 A
18.85 A
2.89 A apart
Current at max power
15.20 A
17.72 A
2.52 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-760
Mechanical
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.224 m²
3.106 m²
0.883 m² apart
Weight
23.5 kg
38.3 kg
-14.8 kg for NEG18RC.27-515
Weight per kWp
45.6 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
-4.8 kg/kWp for NEG18RC.27-515
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for NEG18RC.27-515
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-760
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
264
156 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,306
vs
#74
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 1,232 places
Power density
#1,473
vs
#86
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 1,387 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#789
vs
#3,780
NEG18RC.27-515 leads by 2,991 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,086
vs
#66
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 5,020 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-505
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-500
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-495
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-490
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has higher module efficiency (24.50% vs 23.20%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 has a module efficiency of 23.20%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 is 24.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 213 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

